cpio: warning: skipped 4096 bytes of junk

2004-05-25 Thread patoch
Hi, I use cpio to backup nfs server: find . -depth | cpio -o -v --format=newc | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] " /bin/cat > /PathBackup/file.cpio " The backup directory on backup server has xfs file system When I check the integrity of cpio file: cat file.cpio |cpio -itv , I've error messages:

Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
Hi I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd + spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt. On

Courier-ldap auth-ing "twice" is required?

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
Hi I was just thinking... Courier-ldap authentication needs some user/pass on the config file to validate on the LDAP server and then, once validated, it looks for the user and pass of the pop-ing user. That is "2 auth" on one action. Just a thought... wouldn't be a better solution to use the us

Re: Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Brett Parker
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Tom?s N??ez wrote: > Hi > I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a > sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd + > spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing > t

Re: Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió: > > How about option 3... > > Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other > rubbish... > > @domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses > befo

cpio: warning: skipped 4096 bytes of junk

2004-05-25 Thread patoch
Hi, I use cpio to backup nfs server: find . -depth | cpio -o -v --format=newc | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] " /bin/cat > /PathBackup/file.cpio " The backup directory on backup server has xfs file system When I check the integrity of cpio file: cat file.cpio |cpio -itv , I've error messages:

Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
Hi I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd + spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing this and nobody notices). Everything goes well, but I have a doubt. On

Courier-ldap auth-ing "twice" is required?

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
Hi I was just thinking... Courier-ldap authentication needs some user/pass on the config file to validate on the LDAP server and then, once validated, it looks for the user and pass of the pop-ing user. That is "2 auth" on one action. Just a thought... wouldn't be a better solution to use the us

Re: Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Brett Parker
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Tom?s N??ez wrote: > Hi > I have a mail server with some domains (about 200). I'm taking them from a > sendmail and putting them on a postfix-ldap + courier-ldap + amavisd + > spamassassin + clamav (thanks to perdition, the pop/imap proxy, I am doing > t

Re: Fighting spam with "sendmail aliases" in postfix (spampots?)

2004-05-25 Thread Tomàs Núñez
El Martes, 25 de Mayo de 2004 12:06, Brett Parker escribió: > > How about option 3... > > Add a wildcard to the bottom of the domain name to catch all the other > rubbish... > > @domain.name[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This will catch anything that's not already caught by the addresses > befo