Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Erik Dörnbach
Hello list, just a quickie, I need to add a massive load of users for apache authentication, I have the usernames and associated passwords in a plain text file, one line per user like: : : ... Database auth would be an overshot, these users will likely never change. Is there an easy way to auto

Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:36:08AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2004 23.28, Craig Sanders wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote: > > > For example, I'd like comments on > > > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.de

AW: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Erik Dörnbach
Hello Michael, > untested, quick and dirty Works as advertised, you saved my day! :) OTOH I should someday learn to hack these quickies myself... Alaaf, Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Michael Bergbauer
On Fri Feb 20, 2004 at 12:0533PM +0100, Erik Dörnbach wrote: > Hello list, > > just a quickie, I need to add a massive load of users for apache > authentication, I have the usernames and associated passwords in > a plain text file, one line per user like: > > : > : > ... > > Database auth would

Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-20 Thread Adrian von Bidder
[no cc:s necessary, thanks] On Friday 20 February 2004 12.37, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 08:36:08AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > I guess the document was written years ago, when postfix did indeed lack > > *some* of the features people did expect (one

Re: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Erik Dörnbach
Hi again, > untested, quick and dirty > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > while (<>) { >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2; >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess", > $username, $password); > } Mmmh, I'm not sure why, it looks right, but now I noticed, it doesn't work. The outp

Re: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Michael Wood
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote: > Hi again, > > > untested, quick and dirty > > > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > > > while (<>) { chomp; > >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2; > >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess", > > $username, $pa

Re: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Steve Kemp
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote: > Hi again, > > > untested, quick and dirty > > > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > > > while (<>) { > >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2; chomp($password); > >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess", > > $

AW: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Erik Dörnbach
wow! > > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > > > > > while (<>) { > > >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2; > > chomp($password); > > > >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess", > > > $username, $password); > > > } Nice one, this did it - thank you all for contributions! Ha

广东深圳市圣凯商贸有限责任公司

2004-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
贵公司<厂>您好! 本公司因进项大于销项现有余额<增值税电脑版发票、普通商品销售发票>可以代开。可以代寻开其它行业发票如运输发票、建筑发票、机动车发票、汽车维修发票..。 如贵公司办有来料加工免税海关手册,因各种原因进出口数量不符,本公司可以提供符合货物进出核销,达到货物合法免税,散货搜集于各大口岸代理报关公司。代做产品的产地证。 公司可以为三资企业提供<出口专用发票>。 我公司愿与广大新老客户真诚合作、共谋发展。欢迎贵公司来人来电洽谈业含。 祝: 生意兴隆 财源广进 联系人

Re: AW: Apache: adding massive amount of users for .htaccess from text file

2004-02-20 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Friday 20 February 2004 16.24, Erik Dörnbach wrote: ... Hi, Could you please avoid starting a new thread every time you reply to a message? Thanks -- vbi -- It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one. pgp0.pgp Description: signature

Re: PHP Nuke 7.0

2004-02-20 Thread Richard Brooks
3rd Update . . . After twiddling about in various things, a bit of apt-get here and there - it works Not sure what I did exactly, but it's all working in harmony now. Good thing for the help I got from the list ;) (joking) MT - Original Message - From: "Richard Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-20 Thread Arnd Vehling
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote: Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run? Is it an option to run that app in a chroot? Sure. I though about

Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-20 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 20 February 2004 20.10, Arnd Vehling wrote: > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote: > >>Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly > >>installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run?

Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-20 Thread Adam ENDRODI
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:34:52PM +0100, Bj?rnar Bj?rgum Larsen wrote: > I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've > not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer > postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[

Re: AOL testing new anti-spam technology

2004-02-20 Thread Toni Mueller
On Sat, 24.01.2004 at 11:59:18 +1100, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the worst aspects of spam is the way much of it uses > forged sender addresses. AOL is hoping to stir up some organized > resistance to the practice of address forgery through a new > e-mail protocol called

Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Lamy
Bjørnar Bjørgum Larsen wrote: I am in the process of choosing between postfix and qmail for our mail relays. I've not decided yet. However, I am surprised by the fact that many people who prefer postfix, also enjoy posting unqualified[0] statements[1][2][3] about qmail. If anyone have properly gro

/etc/sudoers precedence question

2004-02-20 Thread Dan MacNeil
Given the sudoers file below omacneil (as a member of wheel) should be able to do anything with a password and should be able to run "update" with no password. I can run everything but only with a password. What am I missing? reversing the order of %wheel & omacneil lines doesn't change things.

Re: qmail or postfix? (was: RE: What is the best mailling list manager for qmail and Domain Tech. Control ?)

2004-02-20 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sat, 21.02.2004 at 00:23:26 +0100, Adam ENDRODI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the license prohibits distributing binary packages built > from modified source, you must rely on other methods of > installation. (On the other hand, once done, it's done for ever; > see the next point).