On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 13:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> One thing I've been wondering about is pseudo-forged @debian.org From
> addresses (like mine) and spf. It would seem we can never turn it on for
> toplevel debian.org without some large changes in how developers send
> their email.
I don't understand
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:54:41AM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> I don't understand how this problem will be solved for folks who travel.
> For example, many hotel access services redirect your SMTP TCP sessions
> to their local smart sender these days, as quite simply, that is the
> easiest wa
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 13:14, Craig Schneider wrote:
> falcon:/etc# apt-get remove courier-authdaemon
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> courier-authdaemon
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
>
--
-
computers are like air-conditioners,
they work better with windows closed
-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have an issue with routing that I just can't figure out.
What I have at the moment is a box set up with an IP and route as
follows (some of the details have
route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
203.221.41.11 0.0
Sorry to be vague, but there was a command I remember once when I had this problem
before.
Seems like I had to do a route add in /network/interfaces. Seems like there is some
parameter
to an interface that allows you to execute a command after the interface is brought
up, and I
had to do a route
Hi Rod,
After a bit more playing and a bit more thinking I finally figured it
out..I think
What it looks like is that the router I am using as the gateway
(203.220.47.153) needed to have its ARP table updated or flushed or
something. I don't have control over it so I can't be sure. What
> it basically cycles through the ip addresses pinging a host on just the
> other side of the router so it flushes the ARP cache. Does this sound
> correct or am I totally off the track here? Anyway it is all working
> now but I guess I'd like to know if what I had to do was correct or
> not?
I
On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 13:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> One thing I've been wondering about is pseudo-forged @debian.org From
> addresses (like mine) and spf. It would seem we can never turn it on for
> toplevel debian.org without some large changes in how developers send
> their email.
I don't understand
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:54:41AM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> I don't understand how this problem will be solved for folks who travel.
> For example, many hotel access services redirect your SMTP TCP sessions
> to their local smart sender these days, as quite simply, that is the
> easiest wa
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 13:14, Craig Schneider wrote:
> falcon:/etc# apt-get remove courier-authdaemon
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> courier-authdaemon
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
>
--
-
computers are like air-conditioners,
they work better with windows closed
-
Hi,
I have an issue with routing that I just can't figure out.
What I have at the moment is a box set up with an IP and route as
follows (some of the details have
route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
203.221.41.11 0.0.0
Sorry to be vague, but there was a command I remember once when I had this
problem before.
Seems like I had to do a route add in /network/interfaces. Seems like there is
some parameter
to an interface that allows you to execute a command after the interface is
brought up, and I
had to do a route
Hi Rod,
After a bit more playing and a bit more thinking I finally figured it
out..I think
What it looks like is that the router I am using as the gateway
(203.220.47.153) needed to have its ARP table updated or flushed or
something. I don't have control over it so I can't be sure. What I
> it basically cycles through the ip addresses pinging a host on just the
> other side of the router so it flushes the ARP cache. Does this sound
> correct or am I totally off the track here? Anyway it is all working
> now but I guess I'd like to know if what I had to do was correct or
> not?
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
