* Craig Schneider wrote:
[...]
> dpkg: error processing courier-authdaemon (--remove):
> Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
> reinstall it before attempting a removal.
>
> Any ideas guys ?
"you should reinstall it before attempting a removal"
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I am working on setting up a backup mx mailer for domain.
It will be our first debian system we will be using for a main production
system.
I have read through the documentation, and it appears I have everything
configured correctly.
I am planning to set it up as a relay for an exchange server and
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:00:55PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> I've not had time to look closely at this, but I've heard it's a
> fair linux/bsd comparison
>
> http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/
>
> let me know if anyone sees an inaccuracy!
an interesting article, and (am
--On Friday, January 23, 2004 14:14 +1100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just l
At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just
like *BSD, "base system" means that i
--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 21:24 -0800 Ward Willats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Yeah? Well, two things:
1) AFAIK, only Debian has a base system that is truly a minimal install.
I suppose some other distros do this now too. But a Red Hat install, for
instance, is like the circus coming to t
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:24:15PM -0800, Ward Willats wrote:
> At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
> >system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
> >distributions have had "base system
* Craig Schneider wrote:
[...]
> dpkg: error processing courier-authdaemon (--remove):
> Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
> reinstall it before attempting a removal.
>
> Any ideas guys ?
"you should reinstall it before attempting a removal"
Norbert
I am working on setting up a backup mx mailer for domain.
It will be our first debian system we will be using for a main production
system.
I have read through the documentation, and it appears I have everything
configured correctly.
I am planning to set it up as a relay for an exchange server and
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:00:55PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> I've not had time to look closely at this, but I've heard it's a
> fair linux/bsd comparison
>
> http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/rants/bsd4linux/
>
> let me know if anyone sees an inaccuracy!
an interesting article, and (am
--On Friday, January 23, 2004 14:14 +1100 Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just l
At 2:14 PM +1100 1/23/04, Craig Sanders wrote:
e.g. his long-winded page on the "base system", makes it seem as if a base
system is something magically distinct that only freebsd has. Linux
distributions have had "base systems" since the early days and, just
like *BSD, "base system" means that it
12 matches
Mail list logo
