Hi Neale
I would look at changing a few things here. Of course these depend on
the budget avaliable and the uptime required from the server.
I would look at getting a different CPU, specifically an 800MHz FSB CPU.
The 2.4C should be the same price if not cheaper and will give you the
same or b
My thoughts:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
them. I'm old-school and would prefer the more expensive SCSI
SCA
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Depending on how you're doing your backups, an inexpensive upgrade to a
> CD-RW drive vs. the CD-R that's on your list might be useful. I
> wouldn't fully trust CD-RW for backups, but it's handy to have to make
> quick images of the
I´m ask my self if there is an utility to resctrict the bandwidht consumed
by services. The problem is that when someone use ftp service or smtp
service with a important size of byte, others can´t use services on our
little network.
Is There any utility which allows me restrict the use of band
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I´m ask my self if there is an utility to resctrict the bandwidht consumed
> by services. The problem is that when someone use ftp service or smtp
> service with a important size of byte, others can´t use services on our
> little network.
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:26, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is There any utility which allows me restrict the use of bandwidht? It´s
> > possible restrict by service and or by IP, users etc...
>
> Linux has excellent support for bandwidth shaping
Hi [please_insert_your_name_here],
you may find help at:
http://lartc.org/howto/
or more specific:
http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/L7-HOWTO-QoS.html
if you search for more fuzzy matching..
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
> Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
> comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
> bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
> them. I'm old-
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1
10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3
Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kbytes per
second ). All experiments are made in a LAN, so I cannot explain
the 35 kbytes/s extrem
Run mii-tool and see what speed your card is using first.
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 05:49 PM
Subject: Strange problem with NIC
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine wi
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
is it Realtech card? if so go get 3com/Intel
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Roman Medina wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1
> 10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3
> Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kb
Hi all,
As part of a project I'm involved in, we need to deploy a new server
(ia32, FWIW: running Debian "sarge") to run a MySQL database (SME-sized,
moderate complexity but not particularly large) + Java Application.
I figure that upgradability probably isn't a big issue here, as the
obvious pat
Hi Neale
I would look at changing a few things here. Of course these depend on
the budget avaliable and the uptime required from the server.
I would look at getting a different CPU, specifically an 800MHz FSB CPU.
The 2.4C should be the same price if not cheaper and will give you the
same or be
My thoughts:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
them. I'm old-school and would prefer the more expensive SCSI
SCA-
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700, Nate Duehr wrote:
> Depending on how you're doing your backups, an inexpensive upgrade to a
> CD-RW drive vs. the CD-R that's on your list might be useful. I
> wouldn't fully trust CD-RW for backups, but it's handy to have to make
> quick images of the
I´m ask my self if there is an utility to resctrict the bandwidht consumed
by services. The problem is that when someone use ftp service or smtp
service with a important size of byte, others can´t use services on our
little network.
Is There any utility which allows me restrict the use of band
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:26, Erik Grinaker wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is There any utility which allows me restrict the use of bandwidht? It´s
> > possible restrict by service and or by IP, users etc...
>
> Linux has excellent support for bandwidth shaping
Run mii-tool and see what speed your card is using first.
- Original Message -
From: "Roman Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 05:49 PM
Subject: Strange problem with NIC
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1
10/100 Etherne
Hi [please_insert_your_name_here],
you may find help at:
http://lartc.org/howto/
or more specific:
http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/L7-HOWTO-QoS.html
if you search for more fuzzy matching..
--
Best regards,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
> Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
> comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
> bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
> them. I'm old-
Mark Ferlatte wrote:
Nate Duehr said on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:13:48AM -0700:
Agreed on the "as fast a CPU as you can afford" and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
th
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I´m ask my self if there is an utility to resctrict the bandwidht consumed
> by services. The problem is that when someone use ftp service or smtp
> service with a important size of byte, others can´t use services on our
> little network.
Hi,
I'm experimenting the following problem: one Debian machine with 1
10/100 Ethernet NIC where its upstream speed is reasonable (2 or 3
Mbytes per second) but its downstream speed is awful (35 kbytes per
second ). All experiments are made in a LAN, so I cannot explain
the 35 kbytes/s extrem
24 matches
Mail list logo
