musirc4.71.exe - firewall question

2003-10-04 Thread Elad Hemar
Hello all,   My personal firewall gives me a message that musirc4.71 is trying to create a listen port through 6667.  It is attempting every 2 minutes...   I believe it is an IRC port.   I searched in google and couldn't find anything about musirc4.71.exe.   I think it is an irc backdoor.   Does a

Re: Hot-backup a complete Debian install

2003-10-04 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:52:29PM +0900, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote: > On Oct 1, 2003, at 10:51 PM, DI Peter Burgstaller wrote: > > >That is exactly the beauty of dump. I would have suggested dd for > >backup/restore but there > >you have the problem of identical fdisk settings. Dump/restore can

Re: musirc4.71.exe - firewall question

2003-10-04 Thread Jason Lim
> Anyway, I blocked it from connecting and I am trying to delete the file. I succeded and even put it in quarentine - but it keeps recreating itself. > > How can I get rid of it - or find the source that is recreating it? This is HIGHLY offtopic to this group, but anyway... Sounds like a virus.

Re: CGI and Virtual Hosts

2003-10-04 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote: > > AllowOverride None > Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI > [...] > > DirectoryIndex index.html > AllowOverride None > Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI > Why is this doubled? Is this in

Apache and private hosts: link to proxy

2003-10-04 Thread Leonardo Boselli
Problem: I have a machine that has its name, say www.small.net . I wish to set on this machine some pages that can have either regular links (when people go directly to the addressed links) OR a sort of proxy link, where if for example someone ask http://guest1.small.net/thispage.ext (where guest1

Re: CGI and Virtual Hosts

2003-10-04 Thread Dan MacNeil
>Why is this doubled? Is this intentional? Copy and paste slip. In the config file they are not doubled. On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Dan MacNeil wrote: > > > > AllowOverride None > > Options IncludesNOEXEC ExecCGI >

Re: named + virtual domains

2003-10-04 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:01:28PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > You MUST NOT have multiple PTR records for the same IP. This is an error. no it is not. multiple PTR records are perfectly valid and are standard usage. in fact, if you have multiple A records (note, not CNAME) pointing to 1 IP