I realise this mailing list is not a substitute for
professional advice. I'm using Freeside (http://www.sisd.com/freeside) to
automate everything from billing to provisioining accounts.
I'm able to configure taxes based on what state or
country the customer lives in. From some mild resear
Hi
I have the following:
http://mydomain shows a Squirrelmail logon box, but the Squirrelmail
logo does not appear. If I go to
http://mydomain/squirrelmail/images/sm_logo.png, the logo itself is
visible. I can use http://mydomain/squirrelmail, but would prefer to
use just http://mydomain/.
I have figured out how to host a domain such as foo.net.
I can make these work:
mail.foo.net
www.foo.net
etc...
But I haven't figured out how to make 'foo.net' work... instead a user
will have to type in the 'www.' or it won't work.
What am I missing from my bind configuration files? Or i
Travis Loyd wrote:
I have figured out how to host a domain such as foo.net.
I can make these work:
mail.foo.net
www.foo.net
etc...
But I haven't figured out how to make 'foo.net' work... instead a user
will have to type in the 'www.' or it won't work.
@ A 1.2.3.4
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Just set an A record to foo.net
The way I do it is probably incorrect (nslint complains) but I set an A record to
foo.net and
to www.foo.net, then set everything else up as cnames.
foo.net.IN A 1.2.3.4
www.foo.net.IN A 1.2.3.4
ftp.foo.net.IN CNA
Quick question:
Does anyone know the correct way to set up virtual domains (all pointing to one IP). I
simply
create A records for them, but nslint complains because my reverse DNS points back to
one
domain. It doesn't seem right to put multiple PTR records for the same IP. Is it just
nslint
te
--On Friday, October 03, 2003 11:11 AM -0500 Rod Rodolico
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just set an A record to foo.net
The way I do it is probably incorrect (nslint complains) but I set an A
record to foo.net and to www.foo.net, then set everything else up as
cnames.
foo.net.IN
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:33:01PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>So the question again, is there some way to access local services via
>internet dns names. In the past I just had a local dns server with the
>domains mapped to the local static LAN ip addresses. I'm trying to avoid
>that and use on
hello,
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Rod Rodolico wrote:
> Quick question:
quick answer
> Does anyone know the correct way to set up virtual domains (all pointing to one IP).
> I simply
> create A records for them, but nslint complains because my reverse DNS points back
> to one
> domain. It doesn't see
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 01:24:31PM -0400, John R. Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>--On Friday, October 03, 2003 11:11 AM -0500 Rod Rodolico
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Just set an A record to foo.net
>>
>>The way I do it is probably incorrect (nslint complains) but I set an A
>>record to foo.net and
Rod Rodolico wrote:
Does anyone know the correct way to set up virtual domains (all pointing to one IP). I
simply
create A records for them, but nslint complains because my reverse DNS points back to
one
domain. It doesn't seem right to put multiple PTR records for the same IP. Is it just
nslin
Hi,
I want to enable CGI on my web-hosting server, but I can't find out a good
security model (permitions of files). I don't want files to be readable for
others and don't want CGI to run apache's group. The main problem is, that
the files must belong to the same group as CGI is run.
The best
Apache has increased CGI security by means of suexec. The Apache website
has documentation on it. As far as I've experenced, you need 1 IP address
per user, but I hear you can run any number of users off the same IP
address.
If you discover how to enable suexec to allow any number of users to us
Rod Rodolico wrote:
Quick question:
Does anyone know the correct way to set up virtual domains (all pointing to one IP). I
simply
create A records for them, but nslint complains because my reverse DNS points back to
one
domain. It doesn't seem right to put multiple PTR records for the same IP.
I know SuExec :o)
The problem is following:
1. If I don't want files to be readable for "others", they must belong to
the Apache's group (say "www").
2. SuExec set efective group to the same, as the file belongs to.
3. If the script is runnig under "www" group, it can read files of all
users...
You probably want to run suexec which runs cgi as a specific user.
Our project docs --including links to the real docs are here:
http://www.communitysoftwarelab.org/sys/project.d/suexec.d/
It is easy if you have not changed DocumentRoot from /var/www
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Antonin Kar
Hi,
i just updated to 2.0 and read somthing about a worker module
which can run child processes with different uids for
for different servers.
Heres the link to the documentation of Apache MPM perchild:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html
I think its still not fully functional but
> has documentation on it. As far as I've experenced, you need 1 IP address
> per user, but I hear you can run any number of users off the same IP
> address.
We are running many sites w/ suexec on (1) IP number.
NameVirtualHost 129.63.24.92
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerName $h
I know this module, but I think, it can't work efective with many Virtual
Hosts - it must either call fork() for every HTTP request or keep running
mass of processes...
Markus Benning writes:
Hi,
i just updated to 2.0 and read somthing about a worker module
which can run child processes wit
I don't see any SuexecUserGroup directive :o)
This solution is nice, but it's using PerChild module - I think.
Can I ask, how many Virtual Hosts are you handling on one computer? I think
it can't be very efective (see my previous mail).
Dan MacNeil writes:
has documentation on it. As far
> Can I ask, how many Virtual Hosts are you handling on one computer? I think
> it can't be very efective (see my previous mail).
We're doing about 50 virtual hosts that are very lightly used.
> This solution is nice, but it's using PerChild module - I think.
As far as I know we are not using a
21 matches
Mail list logo
