Folks,
is it normal behavior for systems having woody-proposed-updates among
apt sources NOT to have a mysql update for the recently announced mysql
server vuln. ?
Proposed updates has mysql version 3.23.51-1woody5,
the security advisory (DSA 381-1) says 3.23.49-8.5
Now what ?
Is 3.23.51 not vulne
Hi,
Can someone give me an indication (suggestion) what the best e-mail
server configuration is for a (very) small ISP, with virtual domains
and some kind of control panel where customers can set up their own
e-mail accounts, aliases, etc.
If possible, I would prefer a system that can be installed
Hi People,
What is the best solution to manager ISP accounting and
WebHosting with traffic billing etc?
What yours are using for manager the ISP?
Exists a good free solution?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Sickboy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> is it normal behavior for systems having woody-proposed-updates among
> apt sources NOT to have a mysql update for the recently announced mysql
> server vuln. ?
>
> Proposed updates has mysql version 3.23.51-1woody5,
> the secu
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> >
> You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> implementation. I'm running it on the clusters I set up :
> http://keepalived.sourceforge.net/ I even use it on Netfilter
> firewalls without any trouble (without the
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
is it normal behavior for systems having woody-proposed-updates among
apt sources NOT to have a mysql update for the recently announced mysql
server vuln. ?
As for how to cope with the proposed-updates/security updates
desynchroni[zs]ation, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-
## Sickboy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Nevertheless, I don't find this desync acceptable.
So don't use propposed-updates. Packages in proposed-updates are not
officially released. "proposed-updates is NOT meant to be added by users."
(Martin Schulze in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 16:41, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> > >
> > You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> > implementation. I'm running it on the clusters I set up :
> > http://keepalived.sourceforge.net/ I even use
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:46:13PM +0200, Markus Oswald wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 16:41, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:38:44PM +0200, S?bastien Lefebvre wrote:
> > > >
> > > You might want to use keepalived which includes a vrrp
> > > implementation. I'm running it on t
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:58, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> Well there's the confusing part. You had said:
>
> I even use it on Netfilter firewalls without any trouble (without
> the LVS support).
>
> It's the 'without the LVS support' that caught my eye.
Yes, you can use keepalive without LVS (j
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 14:48:07 -0300, UnKnown wrote:
> The problem is that the input dir is fill with file of the tipe
> 19yvpW-0001Fz-00-D and we try to reproces the queue with exim -fq but with
> no success.
Have you tried studying the output of "exim -v -M 19yvpW-0001Fz-00" (note,
no -D
Anyone knows What The FARKS is that IOs unit the HP SAN folk keep
talking about? Like in, yeah, this thing can take 2000 IOS per second.
How many bytes is an IOs supposed to be? An IO==Device blocksize or WTF?
It seems like most that have bought a SAN knows how many IOs it is
worth, but noone kn
12 matches
Mail list logo
