Re: chmod in SFTP

Ahtonín Karásek wrote: Hello everybody, I have a small ISP and want to open SFTP. But I don't want users to be able to chmod files. I want rights to be 660 for files and 770 for directories. Is there any way how to do it? SFTP is nothing but ssh... I don't think there is a way with plain ssh to

Re: ISP is just too fascist

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:43, Petrisor Marian wrote: > Hey, I was wondering: is there a way to lie to a squid server about the > identity of the requested files over the internet ? I have internet on LAN > through a proxy server that runs squid and the thing is that the ISP made a > download/machine/d

RE: ISP is just too fascist

Petrisor Eddy Marian > -Original Message- > From: Russell Coker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:05 PM > To: Petrisor Marian; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: ISP is just too fascist > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 16:43, Petrisor Marian wrote: > > Hey, I was wonde

Re: maildir + courrier + /var/mail

Hi; You could use a mirrored userdb, since you need /etc/passwd to contain real home dirs, you could create /etc/courier/userdb to contain the /var/mail/$user 's Maildir as the homedir that courier will see. In /etc/courier/authdaemonrc just have it use authuserdb _first_ in the authmodulelist

RE: ISP is just too fascist

At 01:34 PM 8/18/03 +0200, Petrisor Marian wrote: >So I have to setup a proxy on my PC that I will go through rather than going directly through my ISP's proxy? > >I mean the net will be like: > >PC - MYProxy - ISP's Proxy - Internet ? Yeah. But I don't think I fully understand how this serpentin

# RE: ISP is just too fascist

I am [EMAIL PROTECTED] To clarify things, present configuration is: MyDebianStation - (proxy server/DHCP server=ISP's Proxy) - internet the IP's are given dynamically according to the MAC address of each PC in the network. The IP - MAC pairing is edited by hand (I saw it myself) The ISP's

Servers with X.

Hi, Is it bad practise to use X on your Debian ISP/Hosting machines ? Here I have 4 boxes all without X. I've always been of the impression X on servers was not good. I have one box, a database server - PostgreSQL, which has a cool TCL monitoring app. I'm interested in using. This GUI app. monito

Re: Servers with X.

On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:28, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > Is it bad practise to use X on your Debian ISP/Hosting machines ? > Here I have 4 boxes all without X. I've always been of the impression > X on servers was not good. It's not a terrible thing to do, unless you forget to correctly firewall your

Re: Servers with X.

Thanks Jeff, Yeah I though of X forwarding with SSH but I was under the wrong impression I needed an X server on both machines. Thanks for clearing that up .. Cheers Rudi. Jeff Waugh wrote: On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:28, Rudi Starcevic wrote: Is it bad practise to use X on your

Re: # RE: ISP is just too fascist

On Tuesday 19 August 2003 00:45, Petrisor Eddy wrote: > I am [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To clarify things, > present configuration is: > > MyDebianStation - (proxy server/DHCP server=ISP's Proxy) - internet > > the IP's are given dynamically according to the MAC address of each PC in > the network. > >

RE: Servers with X.

Jeff Waugh wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:28, Rudi Starcevic wrote: > > Is it bad practise to use X on your Debian ISP/Hosting machines ? > > Here I have 4 boxes all without X. I've always been of the > impression > > X on servers was not good. > > It's not a terrible thing to do, unless yo

Re: Servers with X.

Hi, I must also need some minimal X packages on the Host machine as currently the 'xhost' binary is not even there. I'm just searching around now. I see there is and 'xbase-client' but no 'xbase-server' packages. I must have to install X-something on the host/server box so I can at least use