On 5 May 2003 at 16:11, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Gregory Machin wrote:
> > where does debian launch exim from cause when i telnet in exim is running
> > but not visable under ps -ef ??
> Because by default, exim is running in standalone under debian. Jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the info.
Now I wonder why IMP3 have not a testing package... Would it be safe to use
it?
However... Is there any better web based mail?
Which webmail do you prefer? Why?
El Domingo, 20 de Abril de 2003 18:41, Ola Lundqvist escribió:
> On T
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:13:17AM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
> On 5 May 2003 at 16:11, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Gregory Machin wrote:
>
> > > where does debian launch exim from cause when i telnet in exim is running
> > > but not visable under ps -ef ??
Hi,
I use Squirrelmail from Woody as my prefered webmail. It's fast, easy to
administer, nice, and with a lot of plugins. It handles a lot of imap4
folders (maildirs) with an average of 2000 mails per folder at home, with
5 users, in a P233MMX with 32 megs of RAM, and it's FAST. I have tried
other
Tomàs Núñez Lirola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 6 May 2003 11:24:55 +0200:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thanks for the info.
> Now I wonder why IMP3 have not a testing package... Would it be safe to use
> it?
> However... Is there any better web based mail?
> Which
SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
I never could get imp to work properly, but I tried squirrel and
eventually just forgot about imp & horde.
The communication with the server is over the IMAP protocol, so it
d
El lun, 05 de 05 de 2003 a las 18:00, Eduard Ballester escribió:
> hi
> I have an Apache with several VirtualHost and now I have a doubt.
>
Apache is ready to scale in a multiple virtual host environments without
problems. Of course, if you can separate too apache's based on function
(ssl vs non-
Due to customers like the interface, we run @Mail. See
http://www.webbasedemail.com
It's commercial though.
Dee
-Original Message-
From: Tomàs Núñez Lirola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 1:25 AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Which webmail do you prefer? W
This electronic message is not binding on its sender nor on Cetrel S.C.
Any use of information of this mail except the use by the addressee
within his or her business relation with Cetrel is strictly forbidden
CETREL S.C. L-2956 Luxembourg; Tel: 00352 35566-1; http://www.cetrel.lu
Howdy folks,
Well, I did some digging and found some answers. I'm posting my
solution here in the event that others might find it useful.
first of all, there's a bug in woody's logrotate package. Logrotate
will (might?) issue the postrotate command from any logrotate config (be
it daily, weekly
I'm currently running Debian Stable using postfix for my MTA,
mailutils-imap4d as my IMAP server, and SquirrelMail for my webmail
client.. Everything on the server works fine untill a user tries to delete
mail in SquirrelMail.. They can delete it fine in Pine.. But the following
error pops up..
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Dominik Schulz wrote:
>I need an Webmail that works with Maildir or if this isn't possible with
>IMAP. IMP is a bit to overloaded in my opinion.
have you tried sqwebmail? .. i'm very happy with it!.. it accesses the
maildirs directly, so you don't need any pop or imap server. (
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
> SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
>
> It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
Why does the implementation language matter? Do you care if your
system binaries are written in C vs C++?
I run Postfix MTA with Courier IMAP, Squirrel Mail.
Do you have Trash mailbox for that user ?
It looks like Squirrel mail is doing a copy move.
Copy to Trash. Delete mail message.
>On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Splash Tekalal wrote:
>I'm currently running Debian Stable using postfix
Have any of you seen this error before( kernel: udp v4 hw csum failure)?
I can't seem to figure out what is causing this error but it occurs
about every hour or so. This is on kernel 2.4.20 with an e100 intel
driver compiled in on a debian woody system.
Thanks
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:20:46PM -0700, The voices made Splash Tekalal say:
> ERROR : Could not complete request.
> Query:COPY 1:1 "INBOX.Trash"
> Reason Given: [TRYCREATE] failed
This could well be a simple configuration option.
By default squirrel mail moves mail to the Trash folder rather th
It's emphasised bigotry.
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0700, The voices made Jeremy Zawodny say:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
> > It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
>
> Why does the implementation language matter?
Basically becau
Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
>> SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
>>
>> It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
>
> Why does the implementation language matter? Do you car
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
> > SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
> >
> > It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
>
> Why does the implementation lang
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:13:05AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>
> I always wonder what people really mean when they say things like
> that--especially in this sort of context. Can you clarify why it
> matters? Are you trying to imply that PHP software is less likely to
> work?
>
I just think
PHP has some problems, at least in the SquirrelMail arena. First I want to
say I use it, like it, and my clients like it. But I've had to create some
work-arounds.
The one that is most striking is that it will not easily download
attachments of any great size. Some of my clients have sent me attac
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 20:13, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:23:58PM +0100, Matthew King wrote:
> > SquirrelMail. Webmail for nuts. Sounds weird, but it rocks.
> >
> > It's in PHP (I'd personally prefer perl) but it still works.
>
> Why does the implementation language matter?
Dear ISP Group:
I am trying to configure my Debian machine to
communicate with my ISP via a Netopia DSL router
and a static IP address. The relevant documentation
I have seen applies to Redhat systems which have
a much different configuration file structure.
Does anybody know of documentation or
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy D. Zawodny
> Subject: Re: Which webmail do you prefer? Why?
>
>
> Why does the implementation language matter?
Although not a very technical example, you can't ignore this:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Perl+exploits (about 45,400 hits)
http:
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:33:46PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremy D. Zawodny
> > Subject: Re: Which webmail do you prefer? Why?
> >
> >
> > Why does the implementation language matter?
>
> Although not a very technical example, you can't ignore thi
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:33:46PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremy D. Zawodny
> > Subject: Re: Which webmail do you prefer? Why?
> >
> >
> > Why does the implementation language matter?
>
> Although not a very technical example, you can't ignore thi
26 matches
Mail list logo
