I've just changed companies that I work for, and the new place is a real
mess.. One of the first things I want to do is to tie together all the
user stuff that's floating around.
ATM the systems are very roughly tied together with systems to create
users at places trigger by usage of others, I'd l
I would say what you need is an ldap directory. The only thing I'm not
sure on is if ldap and exchange work together (I'm sure they would).
It definetly works with Samba and samba can do the domain login stuff as a
side product.
Debian package:
slapd - OpenLDAP server (slapd).
http://www.openldap.
LDAP was my first thought, but I've never really played with it, I've
seen a few comments on Exchange using LDAP for an address book, but not
as a source for it's own configuration.
I'll take a look into LDAP and see what I can find.
Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Simon Bland wrote:
[snip]
> Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand that's
> somewhat of a 'Holy Grail' for us all. Does anything out there come
> close to a replacement? The main things this place uses it for is the
> shared calander and shared folders
>
> Also, I'd really like to replace Exchange, but as I understand that's
> somewhat of a 'Holy Grail' for us all. Does anything out there come
> close to a replacement? The main things this place uses it for is the
> shared calander and shared folders - from outlook, and they aren't
> likely to ta
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 18:44, David Bishop wrote:
> On Friday 10 January 2003 10:11 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
> wrote:
> > For some, this is near impossible - I'm in Zurich, my server is in
> > Bern...
>
> Then I don't understand how you would expect staying in runlevel 1 would wor
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 12:06, Simon Bland wrote:
> LDAP was my first thought, but I've never really played with it, I've
> seen a few comments on Exchange using LDAP for an address book, but not
> as a source for it's own configuration.
>
> I'll take a look into LDAP and see what I can find.
>
> A
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:45:58AM +0100, Javier wrote:
> I think that "vmstat 5 2" and getting the last line could give you a
> good result.
BTW: I started to keep a
vmstat 5 | logger -t vmstat:
while true; do ps faxu|logger -t ps: ; sleep 15; done
running and log the output wit
Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
nice way to tie linux machines into a MS based network?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 04:41:37P
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Simon Bland wrote:
> Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
> 'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
>
> Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
> nice way to tie linux machines into a MS
> > Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly
> provide a
> > nice way to tie linux machines into a MS based network?
>
> The later, AFAIK.
>
Most solutions use an "Outlook connector" on the client side, and an
IMAP server as backend. They work great untill your mailbox gets to b
Simon,
If you are looking at something to replace exchange, take a look at
samsung contact (www.samsungcontact.com), it is a revamped/rebadged
version of hp openmail.
It is commercial, and it does run on debian (well, using alien as
documented at samsungs site) as well as some other flavours of l
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 23:41, Simon Bland wrote:
> Ximian looks pretty good, but from what I can understand there isn't a
> 'Ximian Server'.. I couldn't quite follow what they meant by that.
>
> Can Ximian be put in to replace Exchange? Or does it mostly provide a
> nice way to tie linux machines i
13 matches
Mail list logo
