Re: Radius choices now that freeradius has been dropped from woody.

2002-04-16 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:03:39AM -0400, Chuck Peters wrote: > At > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142217&repeatmerged=yes > it says "radiusd-freeradius is too buggy. This is a grave bug, by Policy > s2.1.2. Maybe it will be ready for Woody+1." > > What does the Woody+1 mean,

Re: web-based/gui firewall administration

2002-04-16 Thread Robert Waldner
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:12:03 PDT, "Jeremy C. Reed" writes: >I have a customer that wants a easy-to-use interface for configuring a >firewall. > >Basically, the firewall will do IP forwarding, maybe IP masquerading, and >packet filtering. > >I already know how to do it manually. But we are looking

Re: Radius choices now that freeradius has been dropped from woody.

2002-04-16 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
i agree with you that those side effects are possible, but i really think that the best of the world is a good trade off. We run quite a bunch of debian based systems, all on potato actually, but all of them runs some soft which are needed, form unstable. The thing is to test before pushing the u

Re: Radius choices now that freeradius has been dropped from woody.

2002-04-16 Thread John
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:40:31AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 00:28:04 -0400, Chuck Peters wrote: > > One of our techs wants to use freeradius on a production box, but now that > > it has been dropped from woody I would rather use something else. > > Looking at >