Can anyone tell me how you'd do same in postfix?
b.
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 11:31, Peter Billson wrote:
> In your alias file, as your last rule, put
>
> *: username
>
> where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be
> a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Pete
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:01:51AM +0100,
David Biro (DaV3|D3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 27 lines which said:
> if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
You use Debian compiled kernels? OK, just 'apt-get install
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:01, David Biro (DaV3|D3) wrote:
> experiencing several crashes. I think it's because the 2.4 kernel (but
> if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
It's not possible for us to even comment on the likely caus
I just upgraded to Woody from potato and I was running the 2.2 kernel. It told be
that binutils may play up with the 2.2 kernel and to do the following:
in arch/i386/vmlinux.lds.S delete any reference to (.text.exit)
in arch/boot/i386/Makefile change -oformat to --oformat
Interestingly I coul
Hi!
> > experiencing several crashes. I think it's because the 2.4 kernel (but
> > if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> > 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
> It's not possible for us to even comment on the likely cause of your problems.
Ok, to be more
Hi,
Just wanted to let everybody know that this was fixed by moving the mailboxes
to /var/mail and making /var/spool/mail a symlink that points to it. I wonder
why the upgrade script didn't do it automatically.
Apparently Mail and Ipop3d have been upgraded to use /var/mail already but
Exim an
Pete:
>In your alias file, as your last rule, put
>
>*: username
>
Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because
with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would
qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run
any aliases generated by other rules i
Title: :+: ÇѺ£ÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ :+:
+
Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹Ù·Î ÀúÈñ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼ ±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò°¡
Ward,
Yes, it really does work for me.
I thought the point of the original poster is that he wanted any
address that didn't match a real user (and I assume another alias) to be
delivered to a particular mailbox. He wanted the alias file to never
fail.
The original poster didn't mention tha
[deception toolkit http://www.all.net/dtk/]
> I like the idea of this thing but what happens if there's a bug in
> those scripts that fakes the vulnerabillities? Then couldn't it
> just be vulnerable too?
If you want your firewall to remain safe forward the deceptive ports
to a dedicated decept
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, Folks.
> I'm in the process of helping create a fully PAMified box with
> LDAP authentication, and one thing I can not figure out how to work
> is SAMBA and PAM. We've recompiled samba with PAM support, ldd shows
> the pam libs linked
Hi all,
Running squid 2.4.4-1.
How can I config it to log keywords user searched by using Google?
Thanks
Zhao Wang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
We're using Debian Woody (testing) on one of our servers, a we're
experiencing several crashes. I think it's because the 2.4 kernel (but
if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
2.2 (whis is available in woody).
I'd ask if there will be any problems aft
In your alias file, as your last rule, put
*: username
where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be
a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
Bernie Berg wro
Can anyone tell me how you'd do same in postfix?
b.
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 11:31, Peter Billson wrote:
> In your alias file, as your last rule, put
>
> *: username
>
> where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be
> a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Pete
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:01:51AM +0100,
David Biro (DaV3|D3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 27 lines which said:
> if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
You use Debian compiled kernels? OK, just 'apt-get install
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:01, David Biro (DaV3|D3) wrote:
> experiencing several crashes. I think it's because the 2.4 kernel (but
> if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
It's not possible for us to even comment on the likely cause
I just upgraded to Woody from potato and I was running the 2.2 kernel. It told
be that binutils may play up with the 2.2 kernel and to do the following:
in arch/i386/vmlinux.lds.S delete any reference to (.text.exit)
in arch/boot/i386/Makefile change -oformat to --oformat
Interestingly I could
Hi!
> > experiencing several crashes. I think it's because the 2.4 kernel (but
> > if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to
> > 2.2 (whis is available in woody).
> It's not possible for us to even comment on the likely cause of your problems.
Ok, to be more
Hi,
Just wanted to let everybody know that this was fixed by moving the mailboxes
to /var/mail and making /var/spool/mail a symlink that points to it. I wonder
why the upgrade script didn't do it automatically.
Apparently Mail and Ipop3d have been upgraded to use /var/mail already but
Exim and
Pete:
In your alias file, as your last rule, put
*: username
Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because
with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would
qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run
any aliases generated by other rules in the fil
Title: :+: 한베이 홍보메일 :+:
+
클릭하시면 바로 저희 자료에서 귀하의 이메일 주소가 삭제됩니다 ☞ 수신거부
Ward,
Yes, it really does work for me.
I thought the point of the original poster is that he wanted any
address that didn't match a real user (and I assume another alias) to be
delivered to a particular mailbox. He wanted the alias file to never
fail.
The original poster didn't mention that
[deception toolkit http://www.all.net/dtk/]
> I like the idea of this thing but what happens if there's a bug in
> those scripts that fakes the vulnerabillities? Then couldn't it
> just be vulnerable too?
If you want your firewall to remain safe forward the deceptive ports
to a dedicated decepti
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, Folks.
> I'm in the process of helping create a fully PAMified box with
> LDAP authentication, and one thing I can not figure out how to work
> is SAMBA and PAM. We've recompiled samba with PAM support, ldd shows
> the pam libs linked,
25 matches
Mail list logo
