Re: PPOP3 Webmail

2002-01-21 Thread Robert Waldner
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:08:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I agree! I have squirrelmail (which is still broken in Debian), <...> What exactly is broken in squirrelmail? Works just fine here: ii cyrus-admin1.5.19-2 Cyrus mail system (administration tool) ii cyrus-common 1.5.19-2

Re: interpreting email headers

2002-01-21 Thread Robert Waldner
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:44:14 +0100, Russell Coker writes: >I have attached a strange bounce message I received, and would like some >advice in understanding exactly what happened. This looks like a somewhat braindead bounce, but the headers look just fine. What exactly makes you wonder? chee

Re: interpreting email headers

2002-01-21 Thread Christian Kurz
On 21/01/02, Russell Coker wrote: > I have attached a strange bounce message I received, and would like some > advice in understanding exactly what happened. Well, since you didn't include any specific information, I can only try to analyze the header step by step and hope that's what you are as

Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replaced by Zebra

2002-01-21 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
[I'm not sure of my choice of mailing lists, see the discussion at the end.] We use only Linux routers and, from time to time, we have phantom routes. I mean routes that once were legitimate (learned via BGP) but should have been suppressed when BGP info changed and were not. These routes ar

Re: PPOP3 Webmail

2002-01-21 Thread Tim Sailer
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 05:14, Robert Waldner wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:08:46 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I agree! I have squirrelmail (which is still broken in Debian), > <...> > > What exactly is broken in squirrelmail? Works just fine here: I'm running unstable for a number of re

Re: PPOP3 Webmail

2002-01-21 Thread Robert Waldner
On 21 Jan 2002 08:41:14 EST, Tim Sailer writes: >> >I agree! I have squirrelmail (which is still broken in Debian), >> <...> >> >> What exactly is broken in squirrelmail? Works just fine here: > >I'm running unstable for a number of reasons, and for the last two >uploaded versions, you can't eve

Re: [zebra 11943] Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replaced by Zebra

2002-01-21 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:29:26PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > These routes are displayed by Zebra as "kernel" routes (the normal routes are > displayed as "ospf" or "bgp") and restarting Zebra does not make them > disappear. I have to manually delete them. Rebooting, a la MS-Windows, so

Re: [zebra 11946] Re: Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replacedby Zebra

2002-01-21 Thread Dan Hollis
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote: > So back to square one: unless I'm mistaken (which is quite possible > since I'm not a Linux guru), no way for Zebra under Linux to clean > up its own routes when it restarts. "ip route flush proto zebra" works for me. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no ki