Re: Debian GNU/Linux as email & DNS server

2001-12-05 Thread Davi Leal
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote: > > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really > > for sendmail, it has the ability > > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have > > see

Traffic shaping and traffic accounting on one box

2001-12-05 Thread Rens Houben
Hello all, About a year ago I set up a traffic shaping router using debian and cbq.init to allocate measured bandwidth for a group of clients, and used ipac to measure the actual traffic. After a month or two, I found out that the reports generated by ipacsum were grossly inaccurate (up t

get in the action

2001-12-05 Thread get some
Title: Untitled Document

56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-05 Thread Chuck Peters
CCIL.org, a non-profit freenet, is finally getting around to wanting 56K dialup. A big part of the board wanting it now is our per line cost will be cheaper and they want to double the number of users in 2002. Too bad they want all this done with declining donations. One of our Network Admins E

Re: Debian GNU/Linux as email & DNS server

2001-12-05 Thread Davi Leal
From: "Michael Boman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tuesday 04 December 2001 21:18, Roger Abrahamsson wrote: > > I'd go with postfix...You can set it up as a drop in replacement really > > for sendmail, it has the ability > > to use either mysql or ldap as backend and scales well of that I have > > seen

Traffic shaping and traffic accounting on one box

2001-12-05 Thread Rens Houben
Hello all, About a year ago I set up a traffic shaping router using debian and cbq.init to allocate measured bandwidth for a group of clients, and used ipac to measure the actual traffic. After a month or two, I found out that the reports generated by ipacsum were grossly inaccurate (up to

56K dialup for CCIL

2001-12-05 Thread Chuck Peters
CCIL.org, a non-profit freenet, is finally getting around to wanting 56K dialup. A big part of the board wanting it now is our per line cost will be cheaper and they want to double the number of users in 2002. Too bad they want all this done with declining donations. One of our Network Admins Er