Re: PostFix question

2001-11-11 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: > I use postfix as MTA for several web-sites, and I want to allow the address > 'contact' available for each site : for example, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not enough information: Is this "contact" one mailbox or thre

Apache Rewrite Module

2001-11-11 Thread James
Hello Sorry if this is not posted to the correct group. I am using the rewrite module to do mass hosting and it works fine for xxx.domain.tld but I need to allow domain.tld aswell. Is there any way of forcing the www ? RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^.]+)\.(.*)$ RewriteRule ^(

Re: stable vs testing

2001-11-11 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Anyway, thats our take on it... and its never failed us so far. Takes > quite a bit of effort though... so watch out. Just to chime in, we use stable only, with quite a few backports. [1] Often enough there's a package I'd really like - right now it's a fresh postfix - but I find greater stabi

Re: replicating, balanced web-server with *write* access?

2001-11-11 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:47, Christian Hammers wrote: > Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a > good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_ > connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure). > > The problem with balancing between tw

Re: replicating, balanced web-server with *write* access?

2001-11-11 Thread Christian Hammers
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 06:14:23PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > 1) Use rsync to transfer files, and for writes have some sort of database > push (EG use ssh to run a program on the primary server which does the > update). Then of course the data you read won't be as new as the data you've > w

Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems

2001-11-11 Thread Nick Jennings
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:53:46AM +0200, I. Forbes wrote: > > - It seems, that at this point in time, xfs is more stable than > reiserfs. However I am not sure if that is because fewer people > have tried it, and hence fewer people have experienced problems. > Are there many xfs

Fwd: Re: [reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems

2001-11-11 Thread Russell Coker
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Fwd: Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 17:03:35 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:53