> Oracle will do the trick, but the installation on linux seems so fragile:
My experience with Oracle has been great under Linux. I have a
client that is running a couple of beefy Dell Poweredge servers (2-zenon
1Ghz chips, 2Gb memory, 300Gb RAID array, etc.) with multiple, very
large (30+ mil
Dear Listmembers
Im new to this list so let me introduce myself. My name is Thomas and
i work for a small streaming media company in denmark. Currently im
investigating how to build a NAS. In this investigation
some questions has come up which im not currently able to
answer. Neither have i had
So, I have E1 from which is needed maybe 20-26 BRIs. Hardware is Cisco
3620, and it should be fine to configure the rest of the BRIs as interface
for dialup to some completely another server, in order to use it as a backup
uplink (for e-mails e.g.). Possible?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:25, Peter Billson wrote:
> > Oracle will do the trick, but the installation on linux seems so fragile:
>
> My experience with Oracle has been great under Linux. I have a
> client that is running a couple of beefy Dell Poweredge servers (2-zenon
> 1Ghz chips, 2Gb memory,
Im not really experienced but I would say im trying to do the same thing
here. As of now, the globalfs's (http://www.globalfilesystem.org )
site has proved to be agood source of information, and also they have a
proposal for SAN that you
probably want to look at.
Alex
>
>
>1) What kind of netw
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:25, Peter Billson wrote:
> > > Oracle will do the trick, but the installation on linux seems so fragile:
> >
...
> > those issues. RedHat's 6.2EE series applied a lot of the 2.4
> > modifications to the 2.2 ser
Hey There Alex
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:47:08AM +, Alex Borges wrote:
> Im not really experienced but I would say im trying to do the same thing
> here. As of now, the globalfs's (http://www.globalfilesystem.org )
Thanks for you suggestion but apparently GFS dosnt support samba which
i n
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:25, Peter Billson wrote:
> > > Oracle will do the trick, but the installation on linux seems so fragile:
> >
> > My experience with Oracle has been great under Linux. I have a
> > client that is running a c
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:02:03PM -0400, Thomas Morin wrote:
> -. Jason Lim (2001-07-18) :
> |
> | Okay... I wasn't thinking. The salt is stored within the crypted password
> | generated, which is why password crackers work.
>
> Yes, with crypt(3) the salt is precisely the first two character
Another lister replied as I was writing this and I agree with what he
said also.
RC> ... I spent a few days trying to
RC> track down what was going on (and hack in extra environment
RC> variables to the scripts etc). I encountered a number of
RC> problems including inexplicable
I think i bit my own tail on this one. Im pretty exited about this
SAN stuff but thats not at all what you meant...
its actually ocurred to me that it says NAS...hehe
Sorry for all the noise
Oh yeah, the proposal for a SAN is the globalfs itself combined with
neat par. scsi or fc s
> Does Oracle ship RPM's for Red Hat?
Not that I'm aware of. Just installed it using Oracle's *really*
crappy java-based installer.
> I encountered a number of problems including inexplicable
> failures if I used native threads through Java (Green threads worked).
Yeah its bad. I installed 8
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> A few months ago I tried installing Oracle on a Debian system, I
> didn't even want Oracle itself, I only wanted the client libraries for
> talking to an Oracle server and the software development kit. So I
> wanted the libraries, P
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:06:58AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The Oracle installation software is written by some really stupid
> > people. It has plenty of moving X widgets etc to show that the
> > installation is in progress,
14 matches
Mail list logo
