Could you please stop those full quotes and reduce the quoted context to
the relevant parts?
On 01-04-30 Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> Bulent Murtezaoglu writes:
> > > "ELBnet" == Tech Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ELBnet> Try using: headers_check_syntax = true headers_che
Hello!
I wonder what you guys use as performance monitoring/bottleneck
detection software (preferably for a text terminal)? I mean I
would like to see some more detailed data than just 'load
average' :-)
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/
GnuPG:
> "m" == Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
m> Hello! I wonder what you guys use as performance
m> monitoring/bottleneck detection software (preferably for a text
m> terminal)? I mean I would like to see some more detailed data
m> than just 'load average' :-)
Why not
Why does
tail -f logfile | grep keyword | grep -v exclude-keyword
react slow?
In other words, if I do a "tail -f logfile | grep keyword" I immediately
see results.
But if I pipe the output into another grep, then the results are delayed
until some buffer is filled up or a certain amount of lines
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> But
> tail -f access.log | grep GET
> doesn't display anything (unless I wait awhile for several future entries).
This should be:
But
tail -f access.log | grep GET | grep GET
doesn't display anything (unless I wait awhile for several future entries).
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 07:30:44PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I wonder what you guys use as performance monitoring/bottleneck
> detection software (preferably for a text terminal)? I mean I
> would like to see some more detailed data than just 'load
> average' :-)
I don't know the LPP (I think
Could you please stop those full quotes and reduce the quoted context to
the relevant parts?
On 01-04-30 Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> Bulent Murtezaoglu writes:
> > > "ELBnet" == Tech Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ELBnet> Try using: headers_check_syntax = true headers_ch
Hello!
I wonder what you guys use as performance monitoring/bottleneck
detection software (preferably for a text terminal)? I mean I
would like to see some more detailed data than just 'load
average' :-)
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/
GnuPG
> "m" == Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
m> Hello! I wonder what you guys use as performance
m> monitoring/bottleneck detection software (preferably for a text
m> terminal)? I mean I would like to see some more detailed data
m> than just 'load average' :-)
Why not
Why does
tail -f logfile | grep keyword | grep -v exclude-keyword
react slow?
In other words, if I do a "tail -f logfile | grep keyword" I immediately
see results.
But if I pipe the output into another grep, then the results are delayed
until some buffer is filled up or a certain amount of line
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> But
> tail -f access.log | grep GET
> doesn't display anything (unless I wait awhile for several future entries).
This should be:
But
tail -f access.log | grep GET | grep GET
doesn't display anything (unless I wait awhile for several future entries)
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 07:30:44PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> I wonder what you guys use as performance monitoring/bottleneck
> detection software (preferably for a text terminal)? I mean I
> would like to see some more detailed data than just 'load
> average' :-)
I don't know the LPP (I thin
Replying to my own message...
I should have looked in the Unix FAQ first :) I believe the answer was in
3.14. It has to do with the amount of buffering.
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/faq/part3/section-14.html
I did receive some off-list emails about this. One used strace to see that
it was b
13 matches
Mail list logo
