Hi to everyone,
I'm running a local mailserver behind a Sonic pro firewall. Outgoing
messages are sent via exim to the smarthost outside with address revision.
I use fetchmail to get messages from the mailserver outside via pop3.
The problem is with fetchmail: sometimes when it gets defunct afte
At 14:04 24.1.2001, Kozman Balint wrote:
>Hi to everyone,
>
>I'm running a local mailserver behind a Sonic pro firewall. Outgoing
>messages are sent via exim to the smarthost outside with address revision.
>I use fetchmail to get messages from the mailserver outside via pop3.
>The problem is with
Hi,
i'm getting this kernel errors:
Jan 24 08:36:00 Lakgo kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for rpc.nfsd...
Jan 24 08:36:00 Lakgo last message repeated 5 times
Jan 24 08:36:00 Lakgo kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for rpc.mountd...
Jan 24 08:36:00 Lakgo kernel: VM: do_try_to_free
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Felipe Alvarez Harnecker wrote:
> I thought that was a 2.2.17 bug so i compiled 2.2.18 ( release ) and
> the prob. remains the same.
>
> Any hint to solve this.
reading the kernel changelogs helps a lot. 19pre2 minimum.
--
[-]
So, you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anyth
I get similar problems with fetchmail. It times out while waiting for a server
response. Even if the timeout parameter is supplied it does the same. IIRC, this is
listed on the bugs page for fetchmail.
I threw together a couple of scripts to fix the problem.
This goes in my /etc/cron.d direct
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:05:24PM +0200, Antti Tolamo wrote:
> At 14:04 24.1.2001, Kozman Balint wrote:
> >The problem is with fetchmail: sometimes when it gets defunct after
> >downloading messages, it becomes a Zombie
This is probably fetchmail or cron bug. What is the parent
process of the zo
On Tuesday 23 January 2001, at 11 h 40, the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Funcionan con SNMP habilitado o simples paquetes UDP
My spanish is a bit rusty but, no, BigBrother and mon do not use SNMP. (Both
of them can run custom shell scripts which may use snmpget.) Remember that m
On Tuesday 23 January 2001, at 16 h 50, the keyboard of Debian Ghost
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> switches and devices) so I gess basically what I need is a scripting
> method to read in login: and reply passwd: and reply
expect, without any doubt. Example at the end.
> and a method to place
> "BrM" == brian moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:42:20PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
>> ... My manager has asked me to write a proposal on installing
>> Debian or FreeBSD on a few servers here that will be used
>> (internally to the company- i.e- non pro
Unfortunately you loose an IP address with this approach.
S.
Jeremy Price wrote:
>
> Get one of the external ones. The work over ethernet. Download Roaring
> Penguin PPPoE and you'll be fine.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Daniel Free" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Hi,
Last day linux gives me this error:
Unable to handle kernel null pointer dereference at
virtual adress 0024 current tss.cr3 = 2d6c5000, %cr3 = 2d6c5000
*pde =
and after that hungs up.
This Linux has kernel 2.2.15 with 2 GB RAM and 1GB Swap.
Can Anybody help me, pleas
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> Unfortunately you loose an IP address with this approach.
What?
I don't see where any IP addresses are lost using an external ADSL modem
that uses an ethernet interface. Ethernet packets are written rawly by
PPPoE to the NIC which
Unless I'm missing something, running the ADSL nic in your firewall
instead of as a seperate ethernet device saves you allocating each a
unique address.
S.
Jeremy Lunn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:32:50AM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> > Unfortunately you loose an IP address with this a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:32:08PM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, running the ADSL nic in your firewall
> instead of as a seperate ethernet device saves you allocating each a
> unique address.
Nope, it may save on overhead if it doesn't use PPPoE (but it still
might h
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:32:08PM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> > Unless I'm missing something, running the ADSL nic in your firewall
> > instead of as a seperate ethernet device saves you allocating each a
> > unique address.
>
> Nope, it may sav
This assumes that Daniel is using PPPoE or PPPoA. I have a bridged
solution at home with a /29 so have not had a chance to play with any the
PPPoE offerings.
S
>From a personal preference I'd prefer the tweakability of an internal
device Jeremy Lunn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:32:08
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:59:00PM -0800, Simon Tennant wrote:
> This assumes that Daniel is using PPPoE or PPPoA. I have a bridged
> solution at home with a /29 so have not had a chance to play with any the
> PPPoE offerings.
I am not sure if any providers are doing bridging anymore. They neve
You also have tcpdump running on a terminal in your kitchen, so you
have a lot more issues than PPPoE on your hands... =)
Eric J.
>This assumes that Daniel is using PPPoE or PPPoA. I have a bridged
>solution at home with a /29 so have not had a chance to play with any the
>PPPoE offerings.
>
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Simon Tennant wrote:
> This assumes that Daniel is using PPPoE or PPPoA. I have a bridged
> solution at home with a /29 so have not had a chance to play with any the
> PPPoE offerings.
>
> S
I threw out a pppoe question to the list about the pppd that ships in
woody yester
19 matches
Mail list logo
