Default Interface

I have a box with a 3com nic and a Sangoma WAN card running as a mail server andoffice router. Is there a way, when I talk to the outside world across my WAN card, to make it use the ip address of my ethernet card. In other words, when I telnet, ssh, ftp to a box on the outside world, I want it

web based file manager ?

I'm hosting a bunch of stuff for my family on my computer. Right now it's just email, but there's a desire to do web page stuff as well. Up until now I've avoided sending cleartext username/password stuff across the wire by using secure imap and/or web based email over https. I'd like to continue

dpkg segmentation fault

Howdy to all Debian Guru, I got a bit of a situation here that I'm stumped. I was trying to run dselect to update any security issues but came across some segmentation fault. Here the output of the message when I tried "apt-get update" winnipeg:~# apt-get update Get:1 http://debian.crosslink.net

Default Interface

RB> ...Is there a way, when I talk RB> to the outside world across my WAN card, to make it use the ip RB> address of my ethernet card. [I am assuming that your ethernet card is also connected to the Internet] This will work OK if the upstream from your wan card will route packets

Re: web based file manager ?

www.webmin.com/webmin On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote: > I'm hosting a bunch of stuff for my family on my computer. Right now it's > just email, but there's a desire to do web page stuff as well. Up until > now I've avoided sending cleartext username/password stuff acro

Re: dpkg segmentation fault

On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:42:37PM -0500, Mark Jeremy wrote: > Howdy to all Debian Guru, > > I got a bit of a situation here that I'm stumped. I was trying to run > dselect to update any security issues but came across some segmentation > fault. Here the output of the message when I tried "apt-ge

sendmail question

Hi, I'm using sendmail with virtual usertables, etc, and just can't setup user's forward. (~/.forward exists and consistent) All users get mail instead of commiting the forward. I'got some strange lines in syslog: 'Group writeable directory' for those forward paths, which don't even exist.

Re: sendmail question

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Kozman Balint wrote: > I'got some strange lines in syslog: 'Group writeable directory' for those > forward paths, which don't even exist. > > What can be the problem? forgot to read op.txt ? (ie. O DontBlameSendmail=ClassFileInUnsafeDirPath,ForwardFileInGroupWritableD