Exim:
Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
quickly and haven't read it before, because you just want to put in
something, then it is unusable.
Features: probably rich enough.
Speed: much sl
Hello all
Is there a Linux solution utilising satellite technology? Normaly it
requires a standard connection (modem, leased line) to an ISP and data
download happens via satellite. Solutions known to me support MS Win
environment. It is possible to configure with a special card a "satellit
Ciao,
Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:43:30PM +, Jerzy Miszczyk wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Is there a Linux solution utilising satellite technology? Normaly it
> requires a standard connection (modem, leased line) to an ISP and data
> download happens via satellite. Solutions known to me support M
Hello,
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Jerzy Miszczyk wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Is there a Linux solution utilising satellite technology? Normaly it
> requires a standard connection (modem, leased line) to an ISP and data
> download happens via satellite. Solutions known to me support MS Win
> environm
Well, I don't know where to start. Well...
There's someone who want to learn LDAP (ME :)
Debian is using LDAP to authenticate users but I couldnt realize how it's
done.
The LDAP-guide is not well documented and I don't understand it very well...
The first problem is to setup an LDAP server. H
Carlos Barros wrote:
> Is there any HOWTO's
> Is there any text explaining how does it work? I mean The guide explain how
> to get, untar, configure, compile, install, run, change things, what it is,
> netscape...
The beginnings of a HOWTO is available at
http://www.ice-works.com/personal/LaterDu
Hi All,
I've been trying to get tape backup working on a server and almost everytime
I attempt to backup files to the tape drive the machine goes crazy. The
load goes sky high (way over 100.00) and it stops responding to everything.
Maybe someone out there has some insight on the problem.
Specs:
I had the same problem, but I had a scsi HP and I only tried
taper. I was using 2.2.12 with slink.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "JoeCool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 10:18 AM
Subject: Tape Backup Problem
Hi All,
I've been trying t
I've gotten it to work.
I just added the PAM-RADIUS module, setup my conf. file for cucipop to use
PAM-RADIUS, then added a host entry for my machine in my radius server.
I'm using Debian 2.2 because the PAM setup is 10 times easier than 2.1 .
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Ridge [mai
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:28:40PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
> Its documentation is a joke I think. It is 800 pages, but unusable for
> anything but reading it from the start, but if you want to search in it
> quickly and haven't read it before, because you just want to put in
> something, then i
Hi
I get since last week this message (by mail and in console):
Warning: OperatorChars is being redefined.
It should only be set before ruleset definitions.
What doet is mean a what can I do about it?
Patrick
I'm a long time Red Hat user. Basically the company I'm working for is
currently using Red Hat but for some reason they're considering switching
to Debian. I personally don't have any experience with Debian abd
honestly I'm open to anything but I was hoping for some positive feedback
from people
I'm a long time Red Hat user. Basically the company I'm working for is
currently using Red Hat but for some reason they're considering switching
to Debian. I personally don't have any experience with Debian abd
honestly I'm open to anything but I was hoping for some positive feedback
from people
Dpkg beats RPM hands down for anyone who has to actualy administer a
number of boxes and wants everything as automatic as possible (for
upgrades).
As far as being able to customize the distro - go all out. You can of
course edit config files at the "vi" level ;) There are also tools to
take the
At 07:29 PM 5/16/00 -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>I'm a long time Red Hat user. Basically the company I'm working for is
Sorry about that. :)
>Dpkg vs RPM
RPM is a piece of crap compared to dpkg, and now we have apt (advanced
package tool). It's a handler for dpkg, but it's intelligent. The ki
I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's all
assuming that there are debian packages out there that are up to date
(which they're generally not). But this seems to be the only major
drawback I've found to Debian.
--d
Trimming CCs
I was running this in my old company, and it's still up and going.
Debian Slink, with some potato stuff, but not libc. 256MB RAM (please do
not skimp). Oracle 8.0.5 mostly, although installing OAS 4.0 forced many
upgrades, so I think we may be closer to 8.1.5, actually.
Need to ch
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 06:48:02PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> I'm a long time Red Hat user. Basically the company I'm working for is
> currently using Red Hat but for some reason they're considering switching
> to Debian. I personally don't have any experience with Debian abd
> honestly I'm
[i've removed the cc's to -user and -dpkg]
> I agree - dpkg and apt are great compared to rpm's. However, that's all
> assuming that there are debian packages out there that are up to date
> (which they're generally not).
Actually, unstable is usually pretty close to up-to-date. I know (of)
q
19 matches
Mail list logo
