Re: Strange message in logs

2000-04-12 Thread Chris Wagner
At 05:42 PM 4/10/00 +1000, Robert Ruzbacky wrote: >Apr 9 06:47:39 ns tcp-env[17281]: warning: /etc/hosts.allow, line 11: can't verify hostname: gethostbyname(114.trusted.net) failed >Apr 9 06:47:40 ns tcp-env[17281]: refused connect from 209.140.0.114 A lookup: can't get "114.trusted.net" host e

Re: Strange message in logs

2000-04-12 Thread Tamas TEVESZ
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: > AFAIK, the hosts.* files only affect daemons run out of inetd, not > stand-alones. not true. they are ued by any program which has libwrap support. -- [-] kazmer at any cost ! ++ Minek olvasol linux-kezdot ha nem birod ? - sstu

Re: ssi not working

2000-04-12 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> Options ExecCGI FollowSymLinks Options +Includes Includes is for ssi > # LoadModule includes_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_include.so and of course uncomment that line

mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread hendriks
Hi, does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface, administration per web, etc. kind regards, achim hendriks mediagenic services

Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread Aaron Dewell
Postfix+Courier+IMP. [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some > features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface, > administration per web, etc. > > kind regards, > achim hendriks

Server Motherboards with multiple PCI buses

2000-04-12 Thread J. Currey
I am putting together a couple of servers that will become PCI bus bottlenecked. I haven't found very many motherboards that have multiple PCI buses. The Intel L44GX+ has taken the AGP port (PCI 66) and used it for PCI slots instead, but has some bug report against this second PCI where the mach

Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread Francois Deppierraz
Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Postfix+Courier+IMP. ... and for the per web administration ? I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. -- Francois Deppierraz student http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch ICQ: 176 770 09

Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread B.C.J.O
On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote: > Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Postfix+Courier+IMP. > > ... and for the per web administration ? > > I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine. ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and the vp

ca810eal install and NFS question

2000-04-12 Thread Allen Ahoffman
Hi: using a debian 2.1r2 CD, and ca810eeal motherboard how do I get it to do lilo correctly on a 10gb IDE drive? and how do I get it to recognize the onboard intel ether express 10/100 network device? and How do I make NFS more tolerant if it has a drive error and can't read--it shouldn't make th

Re: mailserver solutions

2000-04-12 Thread Aaron Dewell
Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for. Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users. B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12 Apr