Hi all
I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
For example 192.200.234.128 with net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
192.200.234.129-190)
and I whant to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192 with net mask
255.255.255.192
I put it in the named.conf,
At 11:47 PM 4/7/2000 -0300, you wrote:
Hi all
I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
For example 192.200.234.128 with net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
192.200.234.129-190)
and I whant to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192 with net mask
255.255.255.19
On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 10:09:53PM -0600, elyograg wrote:
> > I have a IP block working on my server. how do I add a new IP block?
> > For example 192.200.234.128 with net mask 255.255.255.192 (what gives me
> > 192.200.234.129-190)
> >
> > and I whant to add a second IP range 192.200.234.192
Fraser Campbell wrote:
>
> A recent incident with Pretty Park in our building caused me much amusement
> and prompted our LAN administrator to ask if I can perform any virus
> scanning on the mailserver. Do there exist any solutions to scan email for
> viruses where the mailserver is a Linux box?
At 12:31 AM 4/8/00 +1000, Doug Bean << Mr Bean's Internet >> wrote:
>My timezone is set correctly.
>I just need to sync UTC time with local time.
Set your hardware clock to GMT. Then set your timezone to GMT. Your system
will then be in a +000 offset.
+--
At 10:09 PM 4/7/00 -0600, elyograg wrote:
>have to happen is whatever body gave you the address space would have to
>actually create an entry in their server for each address - yes, 62
>entries, that delegates DNS for those addresses to your DNS server. Either
Actually, your upstream provider
At 04:27 PM 4/5/00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is there a program or a script which sends a info to the sender that the
email was successfully downloaded from the server by the receiver?
Hmm, I don't think so unless you can hack your POP server. You would have
to modify it so it remembered w
Speaking of the SMC cards, I ran SMC EtherEZ's 10BaseT on ISA and got some
weird behaviour from time to time. When I first set it up, things were
great. Getting 7Mbps ftp transfers. But this began to decline and then
finally flucuate. Before I turned off the network it was varying from 2-4Mbps.
I've been looking through kernel readme files, and trying to find a
hardware RAID solution that will run under Debian. It seems that all of
the RAID hardware that is supported in the 2.2 kernel is either very very
expensive, or impossible to find. The controllers that are affordable,
aren't s
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 08:15:13AM -0600, elyograg wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations for a hardware RAID controller with a
> good combination of price and Linux support, and at least one supplier who
> carries it?
http://www.tdl.com/~netex - We got our DAC1164 from there, works under
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Speaking of the SMC cards, I ran SMC EtherEZ's 10BaseT on ISA and got some
> weird behaviour from time to time. When I first set it up, things were
> great. Getting 7Mbps ftp transfers. But this began to decline and then
> finally flucuate. Before I tu
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Doug Bean << Mr Bean's Internet >> wrote:
> My timezone is set correctly.
> I just need to sync UTC time with local time.
Ahem. Had you ever thought of moving to London?
--
Martin Wheeler - StarTEXT - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this what you need?
mail:~# /usr/sbin/rdate time.nist.gov
Sat Apr 8 16:02:16 2000
is how I sync my clock(s). Actually I sync one that way and the rest sync
off of that one.
I am in the Midwest in the USA and system time gets synced with that
command.
I just realized noone else tossed this
13 matches
Mail list logo
