Hi!
Are there any security issues with Frontpage Extensions for 98 or 2000 in
Debian?
Also, what are the alternatives for simple cgi scripts?
Cheers!
Rob..
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi!
You could try connecting at a lower speed, say 56K or 38K and see if this
works.
Rob...
>
>
>Hello
>
>I have probem with Potato and modem. I had Slink and everything was
great.
>Then I made upgrade to Potato and my modem dont work. Problem is after
connect.
>Under minicom ev
Greetings all,
Any recommendations on a *reliable* ethernet card to spec for a Debian
(potato) box to be deployed as a dedicated mail exchanger?
Not thinking so much of the fastest, as something that will reliably pump
data.
10/100, Full-duplex, PCI prefered (what else would you use in a "seriou
>
> 10/100, Full-duplex, PCI prefered (what else would you use in a "serious"
> server?).
maybe some kind of SUNs or DECs 100 NICs :)
but they are very expensive.
i'm using SMC1211TX, it's based on RTL8139 chipset and working fine in my
100mbit Cisco network but when the default ethernet driver (b
I`m installing a mail server. And I need a simple configuration system,
300 e-mail accounts, mailing lists, pop accounts but no login-shell
accounts.
Could you teel which and why of the potato MTA's and POP servers are
better for me?
¿exim, postfix, zmailer, qmail?
¿qpopper, cyrus?
TIA
K-charro
I suggest you use qmail for MTA, aand the latest vpopmail for
providing mail addresses to the users without needing a shell account to
each.
The latest vpopmail package can be accessed from vpopmail homepage
(http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail). If you don't want to store the user data
(authenticati
I am getting extremely reliable performance with an Intel Etherexpress Pro
10/100
Driver in kernel (2.0.36) worked straight off.
No issues in over an year. And cost at that time was under USD30.
-Original Message-
From: Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Da
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, NADASI Peter wrote:
> maybe some kind of SUNs or DECs 100 NICs :)
> but they are very expensive.
> i'm using SMC1211TX, it's based on RTL8139 chipset and working fine in my
> 100mbit Cisco network but when the default ethernet driver (by Donald
> Becker) is loaded then both the
Definately Intel Etherxpress. We are running a lot of "serious" servers
up to 2000km from base so we need reliable gear. The module has built
diags when the module loads at boot.
Ridgey
Anyone have a install CD that will support the Davicom 9102 network cards
without lots of messing around?
Its in the 2.2.14 kernel but is it in the module list for Debian?
Hello all,
Is there a program or a script which sends a info to the sender that the email
was successfully downloaded from the server by the receiver?
Best regards
"Jersey"
Typing away merrily, Jerzy Miszczyk produced the immortal words:
> Is there a program or a script which sends a info to the sender that the
> email was successfully downloaded from the server by the receiver?
Not directly. Email works with co-operating systems using a given
protocol. The base p
I do _not_ recommend the Intel EtherExpress 100 line. (82557, 558, 559 chip)
They have a receiver lockup bug which if you are pushing a lot of traffic,
will definitely affect you. We had two EEPro100s in our mail server (one for
smtp/pop/imap, one for nfs traffic). There was a consistent problem
Hi List
Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
256Meg of RAM.
When I added the ram and did top and did see only 64Meg.
TIA
WFT
man lilo.conf
It's a switch you need to put in your /etc/lilo.conf to get the machine to
recognize >64 mb RAM.
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Wilson Tuma wrote:
>
>Hi List
>
>Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
>256Meg of RAM.
>
>When I added the ram and did top and di
> Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
> 256Meg of RAM.
The kernel will only autoprobe 64M (on i386 machines) to avoid some nasty
bios bugs, IIRC. You need to pass "mem=256M" to the kernel at boot. If
you're using lilo, this can be done with
append="mem=256
I second this. Been using them at full blast for at least 8 months and not
one
problem.
Larry
At 11:14 AM 4/5/00 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>> 10/100, Full-duplex, PCI prefered (what else would you use in a "serious"
>> server?).
>maybe some kind of SUNs or DECs 100 NICs :)
>but they are very expens
It depends on the kernel. Kernel 2.2.x should not have problems
recognizing more than 64M memory.
Some srewballed computers like my Thinkpads are the exceptions,
however. I have to add "append mem=159M" into lilo.conf to
force it to recognize the extra RAM.
Bao
--
Bao C. Ha, President
>
> Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
> 256Meg of RAM.
>
> When I added the ram and did top and did see only 64Meg.
>
very common, but well documented poblem.
most of the motherboards are not capable to tell the linux how many ram is
installed and the Linu
I've tried EtherExpress (under kernel 2.2.x) and 3c905B, and with the
current krenel drivers bot were working bad under high machine load.Then I
switched to the driver from 3com and I haven't got a problem ever since.
The biggest problem are the drivers - If you find good one, almost any
card wil
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Wilson Tuma wrote:
> Would somebody be kind enough to tell me how to make my machine recognize
> 256Meg of RAM.
>
> When I added the ram and did top and did see only 64Meg.
Any reasonably recent kernel (even 2.0.3x) _should_ be able to recognise
this without specific assistan
LOL! Oh, like trying to write to a non-existent memory location? :)
At 09:14 AM 4/6/00 +1000, Neale Banks wrote:
>2) Don't ever tell Linux that it has more memory than is really present -
>it may take time, but Bad Things (or possibly just one fatally Bad Thing)
>*will* happen.
+
22 matches
Mail list logo
