On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 02:20 AM 3/7/00 -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> >is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
> >is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
> >external/different DNS server ?
>
> As long as the servers listed
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Chris Wagner wrote:
> At 02:20 AM 3/7/00 -0800, t s a d i wrote:
> >is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
> >is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
> >external/different DNS server ?
>
> As long as the servers listed
Actually I've heard the work on some sort of authenticated or secure DNS
system is doing well. Don't know where you could grab more info on it
though.. That would provide the more secure environment for doing DNS
updates.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Varga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "C
We are having a problem reaching a specific host on another network. The
host is unreachable from Windows desktop machines. I thought it might be a
problem with the TTL setting on the remote system (it still might be I
suppose) but I'm not a TCP/IP expert and since the performance is so
inconsist
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 04:28:48PM +, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> We are having a problem reaching a specific host on another network. The
> host is unreachable from Windows desktop machines. I thought it might be a
> problem with the TTL setting on the remote system (it still might be I
> suppo
Paul van Empelen wrote:
> Can you show us some traceroutes. And can you ping from the other side?
Sorry I was a little short on information. We can ping other hosts on the
remote network without problems. For example www.galileo.com is on the
same class C as vpn.galileo.com ... we can reach www
6 matches
Mail list logo
