Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:38:53AM -0800, > Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 37 lines which said: > > > You shouldn't have to setup a firewall as a workaround either. If your NIC > > card is configured for a particular I

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:38:53AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > You shouldn't have to setup a firewall as a workaround either. If your NIC > card is configured for a particular IP and you want to stop it, then > simply unplugging the ether

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Russell Coker wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:56, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote: > > This behaviour is not routing. The server is not 'moving' a packet from > > one subnet to the other subnet. It is only just listening for every ip > > it knows on every interface. > > > > Use a fir

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:56, Bart-Jan Vrielink wrote: > This behaviour is not routing. The server is not 'moving' a packet from > one subnet to the other subnet. It is only just listening for every ip > it knows on every interface. > > Use a firewall on the server to block unwanted connections (or b

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Bart-Jan Vrielink
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well, there some kind of routing even: > > /etc/network/options: > ip_forward=no > > was already done. > I still can connet to my server through both IP's even the eth1 has no cable > connected. This behaviour is not routing. The server i

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc V. Liotier
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 12:27, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > There have to be some kind of routing now because I can connect to my apache > > typing the two IPs even I've just one cable connected to eth0. > > You have to explicitely blo

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc V. Liotier
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There have to be some kind of routing now because I can connect to my apache > typing the two IPs even I've just one cable connected to eth0. You have to explicitely block and log spoof attempts. For example, if you have eth0 on 192.168.0

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread jsalord
ginal Message - From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:45 AM Subject: Re: two ethernet without routing > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:27:31AM +0100, > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:27:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards? /etc/network/options: ip_forward=no Check with 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'. > There have to be some kind o

two ethernet without routing

2002-03-13 Thread jsalord
Hi folk's: I've installed two ethernet cards to my debian server and they work fine. I want to give some services to one IP and other services to the other, so: How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards? There have to be some kind of routing now because I can connect to my apache typi