Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Dmitry Golubev said: > I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script > found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it, > mailscannet just takes over all the resources > > Dmitry I suspect mailscanner is a perl

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2004-07-23 19:53:56, schrieb Dmitry Golubev: >I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script >found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it, >mailscannet just takes over all the resources > >Dmitry Fine if your problem is solved... Gr

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Dmitry Golubev
I found the missing library - it is libdb-4.0.so Why has not my ldd script found it? I assume it is a bug that (a) ldd can not find it (b) without it, mailscannet just takes over all the resources Dmitry On Friday 23 July 2004 18:47, Dmitry Golubev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have partial vi

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Dmitry Golubev
I have partial victory - I copied everything from /usr/lib into my chroot's /usr/lib, and it just started to work. BUT as my script which 'ldd' all the executables and copy all the needed libraries to chroot's /lib is tested and working, I suspect somebody has put an absolute path to a library.

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2004-07-23 15:19:33, schrieb Dmitry Golubev: >Is it possible that it is because of grsec and acl patches that I use to my >2.4.26 kernel? Or I have to a make different MailScanner configuration if I >run it inside of a chroot? I do not know, because I do not use grsec and acl patches. I use o

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-23 Thread Dmitry Golubev
Is it possible that it is because of grsec and acl patches that I use to my 2.4.26 kernel? Or I have to a make different MailScanner configuration if I run it inside of a chroot? Dmitry On Friday 23 July 2004 02:03, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Dmitry, > > Am 2004-07-23

spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-22 Thread Dmitry Golubev
Hello, Running latest testing Debian on a Xeon box with exim4 and MailScanner - that was OK until I tried to put that all in a chroot. Now having all the needed packages unpacked in a chroot (I followed the dependencies and checked library reqs for every single executable with a script that doe

Re: spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-22 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Dmitry, Am 2004-07-23 00:50:51, schrieb Dmitry Golubev: >Hello, >1. Running exim4 with MailScanner without Spamassassin - OK >2. Running exim4 + MailScanner + Spamassassin... hmm... well that kind of >behavior... In this case MailScanner eats up all my 1GB of RAM and my 2GB on >swap, and

spamassassin memory leak bug with bayes

2004-07-22 Thread Dmitry Golubev
Hello, Running latest testing Debian on a Xeon box with exim4 and MailScanner - that was OK until I tried to put that all in a chroot. Now having all the needed packages unpacked in a chroot (I followed the dependencies and checked library reqs for every single executable with a script that doe