On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote:
> does anybody know if the package
> snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable)
> is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ?
Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ...
bye,
Roland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh
Preliminary o
hello,
does anybody know if the package
snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable)
is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ?
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html
Version wise it apparantly is anybody know if an upgrade is
planned? Security in my source list didn't pick any thing up..
Thanks
Jam
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote:
> does anybody know if the package
> snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable)
> is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ?
Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ...
bye,
Roland
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh
Preliminary
hello,
does anybody know if the package
snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable)
is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ?
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html
Version wise it apparantly is anybody know if an upgrade is
planned? Security in my source list didn't pick any thing up..
Thanks
Ja
4 matches
Mail list logo