snmpd memory readings weirdness

2002-12-06 Thread Tommy van Leeuwen
Hi, I've just upgraded a few systems to the new snmpd from testing. Now it seems that snmpd can't read it's memory anymore. enterprises.ucdavis.memory.memTotalSwap.0 = -1 enterprises.ucdavis.memory.memAvailSwap.0 = 0 enterprises.ucdavis.memory.memT

Re: snmpd

2002-05-18 Thread Renier Eijkelestam
On Thu, 16 May 2002 22:30:48 -0700 Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > for some reason (pretty sure it didnt do it before) snmpd is listening > on tcp/199 which is supposed to be smux. is there some way to disable > it? > Hi Kevin, Why this options is compiled into the deb

snmpd

2002-05-16 Thread Kevin
for some reason (pretty sure it didnt do it before) snmpd is listening on tcp/199 which is supposed to be smux. is there some way to disable it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-15 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0100, James wrote: > > For potato (?) of course. This should be pretty trivial.. Since you're in potato, it might be easier to simply download the 3 source files from the /pool directory on a debian mirror. There will be a .dsc file, a .diff file and a .orig

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-15 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:12:34AM +0100, James wrote: > > For potato (?) of course. This should be pretty trivial.. Since you're in potato, it might be easier to simply download the 3 source files from the /pool directory on a debian mirror. There will be a .dsc file, a .diff file and a .ori

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread James
For potato (?) of course. On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:07:00AM +0100, James a ecrit: > Hello, > > has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package > version 4.2.3 ? > > I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) > > Thanks > > James > >

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread Stojan Rancic
Hey James, > has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package > version 4.2.3 ? > I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) it's available in woody ;-) --- Stojan Rancic//

SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread James
Hello, has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package version 4.2.3 ? I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) Thanks James

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread James
For potato (?) of course. On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:07:00AM +0100, James a ecrit: > Hello, > > has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package > version 4.2.3 ? > > I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) > > Thanks > > James > >

Re: SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread Stojan Rancic
Hey James, > has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package > version 4.2.3 ? > I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) it's available in woody ;-) --- Stojan Rancic//

SNMPD package (Vulnerabilities)

2002-02-14 Thread James
Hello, has anyone been couragous enough to roll a snmpd package version 4.2.3 ? I'd love to take a copy off your hands :-) Thanks James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: snmpd vulnerabilities

2002-02-13 Thread Roland Thomas Lichti
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote: > does anybody know if the package > snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) > is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ... bye, Roland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh Pr

snmpd vulnerabilities

2002-02-13 Thread James
hello, does anybody know if the package snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Version wise it apparantly is anybody know if an upgrade is planned? Security in my source list didn't pick any thing up.. T

Re: snmpd vulnerabilities

2002-02-13 Thread Roland Thomas Lichti
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote: > does anybody know if the package > snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) > is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ... bye, Roland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh Pr

snmpd vulnerabilities

2002-02-13 Thread James
hello, does anybody know if the package snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Version wise it apparantly is anybody know if an upgrade is planned? Security in my source list didn't pick any thing up.. T

mrtg causing snmpd to hang ???

2001-10-20 Thread Martin Man
hi all, I started to play with stock debian/testing snmpd and mrtg, what I did is that I installed both packages, tuned snmd.conf so that it doesn't monitor any programs and then ran cfgmaker localhost to create example mrtg.cfg, the result was that snmpd hang immediately, I've

mrtg causing snmpd to hang ???

2001-10-20 Thread Martin Man
hi all, I started to play with stock debian/testing snmpd and mrtg, what I did is that I installed both packages, tuned snmd.conf so that it doesn't monitor any programs and then ran cfgmaker localhost to create example mrtg.cfg, the result was that snmpd hang immediately, I've

SNMPD bug ?

2001-06-07 Thread Felipe Alvarez Harnecker
Hi all, i'm a noephite about SNMP and related apps, so i've been playing with potato snmpd and snmp packages. Default conf files. doing this snmpwalk localhost public system get the snmpd agent down for a feew minutes other way to hit the bug is cfgmaker '[EMAIL PROTECT

SNMPD bug ?

2001-06-07 Thread Felipe Alvarez Harnecker
Hi all, i'm a noephite about SNMP and related apps, so i've been playing with potato snmpd and snmp packages. Default conf files. doing this snmpwalk localhost public system get the snmpd agent down for a feew minutes other way to hit the bug is cfgmaker 'public@localh