* Miroslav Zervan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030306 02:42] spake thusly:
> Hello!
>
> I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
> especialy with the spews.
>
> On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
> spammers and is still on the list.
* Miroslav Zervan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030306 02:42] spake thusly:
> Hello!
>
> I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
> especialy with the spews.
>
> On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
> spammers and is still on the list.
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 10:26, Miroslav Zervan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
> especialy with the spews.
>
> On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
> spammers and is still on the list. Due to strategy
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:26, Miroslav Zervan wrote:
>
> Neither I nor any of my users know anybody
> from cz, and the only email I would ever get from there is spam. I put
> those blocks up in response to spam received. And I see daily rejects
> as a result of them (including relay attempts). None of
Hello!
I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
especialy with the spews.
On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
spammers and is still on the list. Due to strategy of spews (to include
inocent customers to force ISP solve the probl
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 10:26, Miroslav Zervan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
> especialy with the spews.
>
> On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
> spammers and is still on the list. Due to strategy
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:26, Miroslav Zervan wrote:
>
> Neither I nor any of my users know anybody
> from cz, and the only email I would ever get from there is spam. I put
> those blocks up in response to spam received. And I see daily rejects
> as a result of them (including relay attempts). None of
Hello!
I've got one question. What is your experience with relays.osirusoft.com,
especialy with the spews.
On Monday my provider get on spews list. As far I know ISP terminated all
spammers and is still on the list. Due to strategy of spews (to include
inocent customers to force ISP solve the prob
The _BEST_ resource (IMHO) I've found anywhere regarding RBLs, Block
lists, etc. is at:
http://www.declude.com/JunkMail/Support/ip4r.htm
It has commentary on EACH of the RBLs with any warnings, cautions, etc.
which is useful for deciding which to use.
Hope that helps!
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:43:20AM -0800, Sis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> > # This script is intended for use in .qmail files. It scans a message's
> > # Received: headers for IP addresses and checks each IP address that is not
> > in
> > #
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:36, Sis wrote:
> > I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully
> > enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly
> > lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again.
>
>I believe they all have a degree
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> I use a program that does that to complement qmail's standard measures,
>...
> The attached perl script is intended to be used in a .qmail delivery
>...
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> #
> # RCVCHK (C) 2002 Emile van Bergen. Redistributi
> I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully
> enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly
> lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again.
I believe they all have a degree of "elasticity". I mean, they all
have some mecha
The _BEST_ resource (IMHO) I've found anywhere regarding RBLs, Block
lists, etc. is at:
http://www.declude.com/JunkMail/Support/ip4r.htm
It has commentary on EACH of the RBLs with any warnings, cautions, etc.
which is useful for deciding which to use.
Hope that helps!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:43:20AM -0800, Sis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> > # This script is intended for use in .qmail files. It scans a message's
> > # Received: headers for IP addresses and checks each IP address that is not in
> > # an e
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:36, Sis wrote:
> > I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully
> > enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly
> > lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again.
>
>I believe they all have a degree
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> I use a program that does that to complement qmail's standard measures,
>...
> The attached perl script is intended to be used in a .qmail delivery
>...
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> #
> # RCVCHK (C) 2002 Emile van Bergen. Redistributi
> I do not use the spamcop rbl, because spamcop doesn't check carefully
> enough, imho, when it lists a server. I've heard that it repeatedly
> lists mailing list servers and takes some time delisting them again.
I believe they all have a degree of "elasticity". I mean, they all
have some mecha
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:59:58AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> I would like it if an incoming mail would automatically cause a dsbl.org
> and/or ordb.org check & listing, but I haven't been able to find such a
> test program so far (there are some, but they expect me
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 06:44, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
> this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
> lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
> various RBLs. So, which RBLs are p
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:59:58AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> I would like it if an incoming mail would automatically cause a dsbl.org
> and/or ordb.org check & listing, but I haven't been able to find such a
> test program so far (there are some, but they expect me
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 06:44, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
> this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
> lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
> various RBLs. So, which RBLs are p
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 00:44, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
> this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
> lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
> various RBLs. So, which R
Hi,
I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
various RBLs. So, which RBLs are people using? Do you drop/reject
connections or simply
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 00:44, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
> this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
> lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
> various RBLs. So, which R
Hi,
I am looking at revamping my mail setup (caveat; I'm not an ISP so
this is somewhat off topic). Specifically, I'd like to introduce RBL
lookups into the mix; connections to port 25 should be compared to
various RBLs. So, which RBLs are people using? Do you drop/reject
connections or simply
26 matches
Mail list logo
