also sprach Jacob Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.1933 +0100]:
> > however, this being an extra administrative burden, and me currently in
> > the process of moving to another registrar, i started questioning the
> > point of the additional two. assume the main server as well as it's mail
> >
also sprach Jacob Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.1933 +0100]:
> > however, this being an extra administrative burden, and me currently in
> > the process of moving to another registrar, i started questioning the
> > point of the additional two. assume the main server as well as it's mail
>
Stability of the Web in general. A domain should resolve regardless if
it is reachable.
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
> i guess negative TTL, but is there
> another reason? after all, what use is it to me to be able t
also sprach Jason Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.2007 +0100]:
> For our high-end plans and other dedicated hosting solutions, we spread
> out the DNS data across more servers... the point being to make DNS
> resolution more reliable.
the two primary DNS i mentioned are already in different co
ecomes
unavailable. Look at "heartbeat" and many others for IP-takeover and other
solutions.
Sincerely,
Jason
http://www.zentek-international.com
- Original Message -
From: "martin f krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian isp"
Sent: Saturday, January 12,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:29:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> however, this being an extra administrative burden, and me currently in
> the process of moving to another registrar, i started questioning the
> point of the additional two. assume the main server as well as it's mail
> backup (the
a general question: so i have this server handling some domains as
primary DNS, as well as being their web- and mailserver. another domain
does slaving and secondary MX, but because i don't want load-balancing
on DNS RR basis for webservices, and because HTTP can't deal with
secondary servers, webp
Stability of the Web in general. A domain should resolve regardless if
it is reachable.
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Services, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
> i guess negative TTL, but is there
> another reason? after all, what use is it to me to be able
also sprach Jason Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.11.2007 +0100]:
> For our high-end plans and other dedicated hosting solutions, we spread
> out the DNS data across more servers... the point being to make DNS
> resolution more reliable.
the two primary DNS i mentioned are already in different c
: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:29 AM
Subject: OT: secondary dns
a general question: so i have this server handling some domains as
primary DNS, as well as being their web- and mailserver. another domain
does slaving and secondary MX, but because i don't want load-balancing
on DNS RR ba
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:29:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> however, this being an extra administrative burden, and me currently in
> the process of moving to another registrar, i started questioning the
> point of the additional two. assume the main server as well as it's mail
> backup (th
a general question: so i have this server handling some domains as
primary DNS, as well as being their web- and mailserver. another domain
does slaving and secondary MX, but because i don't want load-balancing
on DNS RR basis for webservices, and because HTTP can't deal with
secondary servers, web
12 matches
Mail list logo
