On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> my next question of course is what is the "debian way" of applying
> debian patches :-)
Why do you need a debian kernel? I've been working with the standard
vanilla kernel for ages. Download the source from kernel.org, apply your
patches and compile it the "
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 18:36, Oliver Hitz wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> > I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from
> > backports.org..
> >
> > 2.4.26 from sarge
>
> No, the kernel from kernel.org. I should probably have been writing
> "vanilla
On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from
> backports.org..
>
> 2.4.26 from sarge
No, the kernel from kernel.org. I should probably have been writing
"vanilla", not "stock"... Sorry for confusion. Maybe you can apply the
D
I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from
backports.org..
2.4.26 from sarge
hmm. time to diff.
jamie
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 17:50, Oliver Hitz wrote:
> Hi Jamie
>
> On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> > Has anyone successfully applied the MD5/BGP patch abo
Hi Jamie
On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> Has anyone successfully applied the MD5/BGP patch above to a stock (well
> backported) 2.4.26 kernel?
The rfc2385-2.4.26.patch at Hasso Tepper's quagga homepage applies
cleanly against a stock 2.4.26 kernel:
http://hasso.linux.ee/quagga/bgp-md5.en
Hi,
Has anyone successfully applied the MD5/BGP patch above to a stock (well
backported) 2.4.26 kernel?
witness:
fxroute:/usr/src/linux# patch --dry-run -p1
6 matches
Mail list logo