Hi,
We need to implement redundant mail servers and I'm looking for some ideas.
The two mail servers are in different offices but should at all times contain
identical data (well all of the same email at least). So far:
- Postfix will be the MTA
- Courier IMAP will be used for mail retr
Hi,
We need to implement redundant mail servers and I'm looking for some ideas.
The two mail servers are in different offices but should at all times contain
identical data (well all of the same email at least). So far:
- Postfix will be the MTA
- Courier IMAP will be used for mail retr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It is too complex.
I do the following: I have a friend who knows (a little) the topology of our
network.
I write root and users passwords on the paper, put it into the safe, and ask
my boss to call him, if something goes wrong...
;)
>
> I wan
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 16:38, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> > > Why do you need something special for only 20 users anyway?
> >
> > I'll be in South America for 2 months with only seldom Internet Access.
> > They know their NT desktops, but not their servers.
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> > Why do you need something special for only 20 users anyway?
>
> I'll be in South America for 2 months with only seldom Internet Access.
> They know their NT desktops, but not their servers.
>
> So I want a solution, where they can't do too much
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 01:28:39PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 01:14, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
>
> > Please let me know, if I'm heading in the wrong direction. The setup
> > will be for a team with 20 persons, so there won't be too much mail
> > traffic. The only problem is,
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 01:14, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Is it possible (case 2) to run a software raid1 over two partitions (one
> on each raid5) from both computers at the same time?
It's not possible to have one partition in use by two computers at the same
time unless you use GFS or something s
Florian Friesdorf said :
>> I just read through the drbd homepage and HOWTO. Sounds very good to
>> me. Can you recommend it? Did anyone experience any strange/bad
>> behaviour using it?
Well I do. Here we have a failover 2-node cluster serving NFS over DRBD
and (surprisingly) it works like
Hi
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:14:18PM +0100, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to setup a redundant mail system using exim with
> maildirs. I thought I use two mail servers (one scsi
> controller each) and one scsi raid.
>
> 1.Server1 ---SCSI--- RAID5 ---SCSI--- Server2
>
[snip]
>
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:33:04PM +0100, Nicolas Bouthors wrote:
> Florian Friesdorf said :
> >> Is it possible (case 1) to mount one ext2 partition on two
> >> computers at
> >> the same time?
>
> No. Mounting may modify the superblock, and confuse the other machine
> suffisently for it to c
Florian Friesdorf said :
>> Is it possible (case 1) to mount one ext2 partition on two computers at
>> the same time?
No. Mounting may modify the superblock, and confuse the other machine
suffisently for it to crash and leave the FS in an unexpected state.
>> Well, there is another one - I'v
Hi,
I want to setup a redundant mail system using exim with maildirs.
I thought I use two mail servers (one scsi controller each)
and one scsi raid.
1.Server1 ---SCSI--- RAID5 ---SCSI--- Server2
or to remove the RAID as a Single Point of Failure: 2 RAIDs and 4 SCSI
controllers:
12 matches
Mail list logo
