>
> That would not help if you really want to just slow down and
> limit their use of audiogalaxy and stuff like that though.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jason
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "PiotR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, June
>
> That would not help if you really want to just slow down and
> limit their use of audiogalaxy and stuff like that though.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jason
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "PiotR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
anymore.
That would not help if you really want to just slow down and limit their
use of audiogalaxy and stuff like that though.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "PiotR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: per host bandwidth
anymore.
That would not help if you really want to just slow down and limit their
use of audiogalaxy and stuff like that though.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "PiotR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 1:25 PM
Subje
Hi, is there a way to limit the bandwidth in a "per hosts" basis?
I'm actually using CBQ / SFQ to limit bandwith for two networks in an internet
link.
It's possible with the linux kernel+iptables+tc to make a packet queue with
TOS based priority?
My coleagues are eating a lot of bw with the use
Hi, is there a way to limit the bandwidth in a "per hosts" basis?
I'm actually using CBQ / SFQ to limit bandwith for two networks in an internet
link.
It's possible with the linux kernel+iptables+tc to make a packet queue with
TOS based priority?
My coleagues are eating a lot of bw with the use
6 matches
Mail list logo
