On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Sonny Kupka wrote:
> pop-3 stream tcp nowait.200 root/usr/sbin/tcpd
> /usr/sbin/in.qpopper -R -B -f /etc/qpopper.conf
>
> Key being: nowait.200
xinetd uses different configurations than inetd.
Some parts of my configs:
# - added cps for 50 seconds
++ 25/11/02 08:51 -0800 - Jeremy C. Reed:
>On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Scott wrote:
>
>> > No performance issues using vm-pop3d, exim (MTA), apache and
>> > OpenWebMail with around 10,000 email accounts on similar hardware.
>>
>> 10,000 email accounts on a similar machine? Man, I must be doing
>> somet
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Scott wrote:
> > No performance issues using vm-pop3d, exim (MTA), apache and
> > OpenWebMail with around 10,000 email accounts on similar hardware.
>
> 10,000 email accounts on a similar machine? Man, I must be doing
> something wrong! I assume you are running Debian? So
I am running Debian 3.0 on one mail server with 3,000+ mailboxes using
Postfix/Procmail/IMP/MySQL/qpopper/Apache. And I have very low cpu/mem
usages. And it is a single proc PIII-500 with 256MB of ram. And it works
great.
I agree with the other posts that qpopper is a dog, but I don't such a
perf
Qpopper also has a habit of just stopping, I have have to
reload xinetd several times a day.
I run qpopper here with users keeping mail in /var/mail/username and have
no problems what so ever with the setup..
You have your server set to allow alot of "pops" at the same time?
I have this:
p
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy C. Reed) [2002.11.23 17:19]:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Scott St. John wrote:
> > So the question is: is anyone running a similar set up with either
> > Sendmail or Posrtfix servicing 2,000+ email accounts with any
> > performance issues?
>
> No performance issues using vm
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:01:28PM -0500, Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > - install radius on the RH or Mandrake machine
> > - configure your NAS boxes to use it
> > - blow away the suse box and install debian
> > - (optionally) move radius back to it, configure NA
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Craig Sanders wrote:
> - install radius on the RH or Mandrake machine
> - configure your NAS boxes to use it
> - blow away the suse box and install debian
> - (optionally) move radius back to it, configure NAS boxes to use it again.
> - install apache and start moving vho
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Use top(1) to to view processes.
Have been doing that constantly, my eyes hurt :) Sendmail the top dog
with the occasional hit from Openwebmail which shows as perl. Popper will
do a quick peak and then usually drop off.
> No performance issues usin
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Scott St. John wrote:
> territory and installed 7.2 with Sendmail/QPopper/Apache/OpenWebMail. I am
> paying
> for that now with a huge performance problem. I am seeing Load Averages
> spiking
> above 6 during the day. Hardware is a Dual P3-600 with a gig of ram on a IBM
>
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:20:25AM +0100, Torsten Krueger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> > > A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to Debian. As
> > > luck
> > > would have it that BSDi se
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:56:15AM -0500, Scott St. John wrote:
> At 01:43 PM 11/23/2002 +0100, Torsten Krueger wrote:
> >You can convert the mboxes with mbox2maildir. Changing from Sendmail
> >to Postfix shouldn't bei a hassle and if properly prepared shouldn't
> >produce a long downtime. Dependin
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:57:45 +1100, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Maildir does have some other advantages (e.g. it's NFS safe, and there
>are no locking hassles*) so, all else being equal, it's a good choice to
>make...but mbox isn't a bad choice either.
There is no decent IMAP server
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> territory and installed 7.2 with Sendmail/QPopper/Apache/OpenWebMail. I am
Of course, people on the postfix mailing list are biased but I
think switching away from sendmail would take off some of the load
(assuming that sendmail actuall
At 01:43 PM 11/23/2002 +0100, Torsten Krueger wrote:
You can convert the mboxes with mbox2maildir. Changing from Sendmail to
Postfix shouldn't bei a hassle and if properly prepared shouldn't produce
a long downtime. Depending on the amount and size of your mboxes the
conversion takes some time, bu
Hi Scott,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Scott St. John wrote:
> Is it possible to move current mail to the maildir format? I inconvenienced
> the clients once with the crash and now that things are not running as smooth
> I don't want to run the risk of long amounts of downtime. I really want to go
> Po
At 09:20 AM 11/23/2002 +0100, Torsten Krueger wrote:
Hmm - watch out for the load qpopper produces. Since the sendmail/qpopper
combination uses mbox a users mailbox is copied every time the mbox is
accessed. If you have large mailboxes (e.g. no quota an users leave mail
on server) this can produce
At 08:40 AM 11/23/2002 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
Apart from webmail that should be a trivial load. Webmail systems seem to
take up lots of resources in my experience, is it an option to have a
separate machine for webmail?
I was thinking the same thing, if I can get Openwebmail to load on ano
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:26:14AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:20, Torsten Krueger wrote:
> > Hmm - watch out for the load qpopper produces. Since the
> > sendmail/qpopper combination uses mbox a users mailbox is copied
> > every time the mbox is accessed. If you have large
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:20, Torsten Krueger wrote:
> Hmm - watch out for the load qpopper produces. Since the sendmail/qpopper
> combination uses mbox a users mailbox is copied every time the mbox is
> accessed. If you have large mailboxes (e.g. no quota an users leave mail
> on server) this can pro
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 08:40:20AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> > A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to
> > Debian. As luck would have it that BSDi server gave out last Monday
> > and I had to move fast to replace it. K
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> > A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to Debian. As
> > luck
> > would have it that BSDi server gave out last Monday and I had to move fast
> > to replace
> > it. Knowing
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:51, Scott St. John wrote:
> A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to Debian. As
> luck
> would have it that BSDi server gave out last Monday and I had to move fast
> to replace
> it. Knowing I can do a RH install in about 30 minutes I went the route o
Hi Gang:
A few weeks ago we talked about me moving a server from BSDi to Debian. As
luck
would have it that BSDi server gave out last Monday and I had to move fast
to replace
it. Knowing I can do a RH install in about 30 minutes I went the route of
familiar
territory and installed 7.2 with Se
24 matches
Mail list logo
