On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:58 +0545 (NPT), Ritesh wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x)
> to the internet and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers.
> I've enabled nat and my customers are able to brows
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:38:58 +0545 (NPT), Ritesh wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x)
> to the internet and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers.
> I've enabled nat and my customers are able to brows
Hi Ritesh,
Maybe subenetting is a solution for you so that you only have x ip's
available for your network.
Cheers,
Kevin.
John Hedges wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:38:58PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello all,
I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to th
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:38:58PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the
> internet and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled
> nat and my customers are able to browse the internet well
I think I've got a little confused. For example I hit the following:
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
iptables -A FORWARD -s xx:xx:xx:xx -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
xx would be the hardware address.
Now wouldn't he be able to change the ip and still be connected because he
still has the same hardware mac addre
Hi Ritesh,
Maybe subenetting is a solution for you so that you only have x ip's
available for your network.
Cheers,
Kevin.
John Hedges wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:38:58PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello all,
I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to th
how about limiting on MAC addresses :?
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the
> internet and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled
> nat and my customers are able to brow
Hello all,
I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the
internet and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled
nat and my customers are able to browse the internet well (My customer are
cyber cafe owners). I've limited their bandwidth. The iss
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:38:58PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the internet
> and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled nat and my
> customers are able to browse the internet well
I think I've got a little confused. For example I hit the following:
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
iptables -A FORWARD -s xx:xx:xx:xx -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
xx would be the hardware address.
Now wouldn't he be able to change the ip and still be connected because he still has
the same hardware mac addre
how about limiting on MAC addresses :?
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the internet
> and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled nat and my
> customers are able to brow
Hello all,
I have a masquerading server with 2 ethernet cards, eth0(202.52.x.x) to the internet
and eth1(192.168.100.x) to my local network customers. I've enabled nat and my
customers are able to browse the internet well (My customer are cyber cafe owners).
I've limited their bandwidth. The iss
12 matches
Mail list logo
