> Anyway, I blocked it from connecting and I am trying to delete the file.
I succeded and even put it in quarentine - but it keeps recreating itself.
>
> How can I get rid of it - or find the source that is recreating it?
This is HIGHLY offtopic to this group, but anyway...
Sounds like a virus.
Hello all,
My personal firewall gives me a message that musirc4.71 is trying to create a listen port through 6667. It is attempting every 2 minutes...
I believe it is an IRC port.
I searched in google and couldn't find anything about musirc4.71.exe.
I think it is an irc backdoor.
Does a
Hello all,
Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to allow connections to
a local DNS port(53) from remote privledges ports(< 1024)?
As I understand it *all* DNS is one of:
local port remote port
(53)<-> (53)
(1024:65535) -> (53)
(53) <- (1024:65535)
PB> Hello all, Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to
PB> allow connections to a local DNS port(53) from remote
PB> privledges ports(< 1024)?
Yes. Windows and possibly some other systems (little internet
devices maybe) do not have this "privileged port" notion.
Why do yo
Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
>
> PB> Hello all, Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to
> PB> allow connections to a local DNS port(53) from remote
> PB> privledges ports(< 1024)?
>
> Yes. Windows and possibly some other systems (little internet
> devices maybe) do not have this
> "PB" == Peter Billson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
PB> Paranoia. Generally accepted practice when setting up a
PB> firewall is to be as restrictive as possible without breaking
PB> things, that includes restricting the originating ports.
I don't see what you can gain by th
Thank you for helping me understand this more clearly. I like being
able to identify *why* all traffic is occuring and your explinations
helped me do that... and you are of course correct.
Also, just for the archives, I can add one more reason to allow it:
Cicso port forwarding firewalls.
Pet
Thank you for helping me understand this more clearly. I like being
able to identify *why* all traffic is occuring and your explinations
helped me do that... and you are of course correct.
Also, just for the archives, I can add one more reason to allow it:
Cicso port forwarding firewalls.
Pete
> "PB" == Peter Billson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
PB> Paranoia. Generally accepted practice when setting up a
PB> firewall is to be as restrictive as possible without breaking
PB> things, that includes restricting the originating ports.
I don't see what you can gain by t
Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
>
> PB> Hello all, Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to
> PB> allow connections to a local DNS port(53) from remote
> PB> privledges ports(< 1024)?
>
> Yes. Windows and possibly some other systems (little internet
> devices maybe) do not have thi
PB> Hello all, Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to
PB> allow connections to a local DNS port(53) from remote
PB> privledges ports(< 1024)?
Yes. Windows and possibly some other systems (little internet
devices maybe) do not have this "privileged port" notion.
Why do y
Hello all,
Can anyone tell me if there is a good reason to allow connections to
a local DNS port(53) from remote privledges ports(< 1024)?
As I understand it *all* DNS is one of:
local port remote port
(53)<-> (53)
(1024:65535) -> (53)
(53) <- (1024:65535
12 matches
Mail list logo
