Re: default iptables (again)

2003-03-17 Thread Blu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:51:16PM +1100, Glenn Hocking wrote: > Hi > > Ok I now know what the issue is. The iptables NAT box is a PPPoE box > running PPPoE on boot. Every time it drops the connection and > re-establishes itself (as adsl does) it drops the firewall rules and > reloads them back

default iptables (again)

2003-03-17 Thread Glenn Hocking
Hi Ok I now know what the issue is. The iptables NAT box is a PPPoE box running PPPoE on boot. Every time it drops the connection and re-establishes itself (as adsl does) it drops the firewall rules and reloads them back to the default. So directly after boot my rules are loaded but as soon as

Re: default iptables (again)

2003-03-17 Thread Blu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:51:16PM +1100, Glenn Hocking wrote: > Hi > > Ok I now know what the issue is. The iptables NAT box is a PPPoE box > running PPPoE on boot. Every time it drops the connection and > re-establishes itself (as adsl does) it drops the firewall rules and > reloads them back

default iptables (again)

2003-03-17 Thread Glenn Hocking
Hi Ok I now know what the issue is. The iptables NAT box is a PPPoE box running PPPoE on boot. Every time it drops the connection and re-establishes itself (as adsl does) it drops the firewall rules and reloads them back to the default. So directly after boot my rules are loaded but as soon as