Wednesday 03 December 2003 15:36, Marcel Hicking >
> To throw into something different:
> PowerDNS works fine with MySQL as a backend
http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-dns/0310/msg00048.html
short version :) i use nsd for authoritive dns servers and bind9 for
recursive.
--
Wednesday 03 December 2003 15:36, Marcel Hicking >
> To throw into something different:
> PowerDNS works fine with MySQL as a backend
http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-dns/0310/msg00048.html
short version :) i use nsd for authoritive dns servers and bind9 for
recursive.
--
--
To UNSUBS
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:26PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to generate flat
> files from the backend db to avoid such risks?
I agree.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:26PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to generate flat
> files from the backend db to avoid such risks?
I agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On December 3, 2003 04:04 pm, David Zejda wrote:
> thanks for reply!
> i only guess, as well as your dns depends on some database (RDBMS or LDAP
> or something else), it increases the danger of attacks, especially DoS (db
> is down -> dns respectively). flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be
> be
On December 3, 2003 04:04 pm, David Zejda wrote:
> thanks for reply!
> i only guess, as well as your dns depends on some database (RDBMS or LDAP
> or something else), it increases the danger of attacks, especially DoS (db
> is down -> dns respectively). flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be
> be
thanks for reply!
i only guess, as well as your dns depends on some database (RDBMS or LDAP or
something else), it increases the danger of attacks, especially DoS (db is
down -> dns respectively). flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to
generate flat files from the backend db to avoid suc
thanks for reply!
i only guess, as well as your dns depends on some database (RDBMS or LDAP or
something else), it increases the danger of attacks, especially DoS (db is
down -> dns respectively). flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to
generate flat files from the backend db to avoid suc
--Tuesday, December 02, 2003 17:18:05 -0500 Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On December 2, 2003 10:46 am, David Zejda wrote:
>
>> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
>> experiences/stability...?
>> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
To throw into something different:
PowerDNS wor
--Tuesday, December 02, 2003 17:18:05 -0500 Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On December 2, 2003 10:46 am, David Zejda wrote:
>
>> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
>> experiences/stability...?
>> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
To throw into something different:
PowerDNS wor
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:46:55PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 11 lines which said:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
nsd. See
http://www.nic-generique.prd.fr/sheets/practical/nameserver-en>
for a good reason.
On December 2, 2003 10:46 am, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
For an authoritative only server there is nsd. It's only available in
unstable but it should be easy enough to backport. I've only us
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:46:55PM +0100,
David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 11 lines which said:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
nsd. See
http://www.nic-generique.prd.fr/sheets/practical/nameserver-en>
for a good reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On December 2, 2003 10:46 am, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
For an authoritative only server there is nsd. It's only available in
unstable but it should be easy enough to backport. I've only us
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 06:46, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
>
> thanks
> David
>
Have to start somewhere so dive in after you feel you enough info. :-)
We run djbdns,rbldns,etc., right now. All u
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 06:46, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
>
> thanks
> David
>
Have to start somewhere so dive in after you feel you enough info. :-)
We run djbdns,rbldns,etc., right now. All u
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 09:46, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
Please explore the list for a three month very fun discussion about it
(i still remember it).
>
> thanks
> David
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 09:46, David Zejda wrote:
> what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
> experiences/stability...?
> i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
Please explore the list for a three month very fun discussion about it
(i still remember it).
>
> thanks
> David
>
Bind 9 is a total revamp of Bind 8.
Bind8 had a bunch of security holes in it, so tinyDNS
and the others came about. Bind9 was a rewrite from scratch
with security as a goal.
Bind9 is good for all types of general DNS stuff.
Tiny-DNS is probably good for some applications,
however you are going
Bind 9 is a total revamp of Bind 8.
Bind8 had a bunch of security holes in it, so tinyDNS
and the others came about. Bind9 was a rewrite from scratch
with security as a goal.
Bind9 is good for all types of general DNS stuff.
Tiny-DNS is probably good for some applications,
however you are going
For speed
maradns.org.
Somwhat more secure djbdns.
Regards.
At 17:46 02.12.2003, David Zejda wrote:
what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
experiences/stability...?
i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
For speed
maradns.org.
Somwhat more secure djbdns.
Regards.
At 17:46 02.12.2003, David Zejda wrote:
what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
experiences/stability...?
i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
experiences/stability...?
i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
thanks
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what do you prefer for authoritative dns?
experiences/stability...?
i have no verbose bind knowledge yet.
thanks
David
24 matches
Mail list logo
