Re: best way to keep web servers in sync

2002-03-13 Thread Lance Levsen
We use ssh -> cvs -> perl -> ssh -> perl for this. User commits a change to cvs, the loginfo process execs a perl script that itself ssh exec's a remote program to cd to the appropriate dir and cvs update the module. The advantage is that the live web tree only needs one user with write acce

Re: best way to keep web servers in sync

2002-03-12 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thanks for your excellent experiences. Ok. This is my situation. I have a stage environment, in which web files are ready for testing and go to the productive servers. If I use rsync with --delete parameter on a directory, it will rsync file by file onto t

Re: best way to keep web servers in sync

2002-03-03 Thread Pascal Bourguignon
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: > I have some apache web servers under the server load-balancer. To > keep the static html and php files in sync among them, I have to use > NFS to achieve the purpose. My problem is, since NFS is not quite > stable and is prompt to

Re: best way to keep web servers in sync

2002-03-03 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: > I have some apache web servers under the server load-balancer. To > keep the static html and php files in sync among them, I have to use > NFS to achieve the purpose. My problem is, since NFS is not quite > stable and is prompt to

best way to keep web servers in sync

2002-03-03 Thread Patrick Hsieh
Hello list, I have some apache web servers under the server load-balancer. To keep the static html and php files in sync among them, I have to use NFS to achieve the purpose. My problem is, since NFS is not quite stable and is prompt to be a network bottleneck, I have to find other methods to ke