On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 03:55, David Wilk wrote:
> I'm going to have to disagree with the above poster. This VM behavior
> is not ideal and is really counter-productive. 2.4.x saw lot's of VM
> work to improve performance over broad ranges of work-load. The
> problems occur when changes are made f
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 03:55, David Wilk wrote:
> I'm going to have to disagree with the above poster. This VM behavior
> is not ideal and is really counter-productive. 2.4.x saw lot's of VM
> work to improve performance over broad ranges of work-load. The
> problems occur when changes are made f
why it is swapping so aggressively... to the point that
> it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
> size.
>
> Jas
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2004 7:3
why it is swapping so aggressively... to the point that
> it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
> size.
>
> Jas
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent:
ping so aggressively... to the point that
it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
size.
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: bdflush or others affecting disk cache
>
ping so aggressively... to the point that
it is running itself out of RAM for active programs to increase cache
size.
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, 19 April, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: bdflush or others
causing it to be disk bound... causing the system to increase cache
size... causing more swap usage... etc. Anyone see this before?
- Original Message -
From: "Donovan Baarda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 19
causing it to be disk bound... causing the system to increase cache
size... causing more swap usage... etc. Anyone see this before?
- Original Message -
From: "Donovan Baarda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 09:31, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
[...]
> The problem is that swap usage can grow to 100Mb... yet the buffers and
> cache remain at astoundingly high levels.
>
> I can actually see memory to cache
Hi all,
I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
Here is the output of top:
Mem: 1027212K av, 1018600K used,8612K free, 0K shrd, 70728K
buff
Swap: 2097136K av, 35556K used, 2061580K free 690140K
cached
and the output of free:
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 09:31, Jason Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
[...]
> The problem is that swap usage can grow to 100Mb... yet the buffers and
> cache remain at astoundingly high levels.
>
> I can actually see memory to cache
Hi all,
I've been banging my head on this one for a while now on a 2.4.20 system.
Here is the output of top:
Mem: 1027212K av, 1018600K used,8612K free, 0K shrd, 70728K
buff
Swap: 2097136K av, 35556K used, 2061580K free 690140K
cached
and the output of free:
12 matches
Mail list logo
