Re: Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Chris Wagner
At 12:00 PM 3/29/00 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Wich one do you recomend for use with apache and separate stats for each >domain ? Yeah, Analog is dreamy for stats. Very customizable. +---+ |-=I T ' S P R I N C I P L E

RE: Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Scott Thompson
Programming & Server Admin Internet Brokers Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetbrokers.ab.ca Office: (403) 232-1032 Fax: (403) 265-2843 -Original Message- From: Jonathan McDowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 3:55 AM To: Debian Isp Subject: Re: Webserver s

Re: Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Jonathan McDowell
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Jaume Teixi wrote: > Wich one do you recomend for use with apache and separate stats for > each domain ? Analog for text stats that you can email to people, Webalyzer for pretty graphical stats that you can put up on the web. We use both. J. -- A foo

Re: Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Security
I use webalizer with crond and a script that calls seperate config files for each domain. Like this: webalizer -c domain.a.conf webalizer -c domain.b.conf webalizer -c domain.c.conf and so on. Then use custom configs for each domain. I will note each domain needs its own logfile but you sho

Re: Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> Wich one do you recomend for use with apache and separate stats for each > domain ? analog. for windoze-type customers: analog + rmagic both available as debian packages, in potato or woody, can't recall now.

Webserver stats for customers

2000-03-29 Thread Jaume Teixi
Wich one do you recomend for use with apache and separate stats for each domain ? thanks begin:vcard n:Teixi;Jaume tel;fax:972 46 31 14 tel;work:972 46 30 50 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.6tems.com org:6TEMS;Ducform, SA adr:;;Pla de l'Estany, s/n;CASSÀ DE LA SELVA;Girona;17244;Spain version: