eff S Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
such
Jeff S Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 17:41, Andreas Rabus wrote:
> >Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
>
> report
>
> >the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
>
> required.
>
> >What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalize
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 17:41, Andreas Rabus wrote:
> >Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
>
> report
>
> >the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
>
> required.
>
> >What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webaliz
n ISP List (E-Mail)
Subject: Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port
80?),
>
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
> and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served.
bian ISP List (E-Mail)
Subject: Re: Webalizer and net-acct differences
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port
80?)
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
> and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind of data served
hi,
>Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
>the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
>
>What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
>files and reporting them in some other format?
the answ
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:17, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> > Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size
> > of a packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>
> From the Apache docs @
> http://http
hi,
>Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
>the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
>
>What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
>files and reporting them in some other format?
the ans
On Monday 07 May 2001 18:17, Haim Dimermanas wrote:
> > Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> > included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size
> > of a packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>
> From the Apache docs @
> http://htt
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
> packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number
hi,
for our accounting i tried to write a script that uses net-acct (an
user-space daemon to log all network traffic over an net-device) to collect
the webtraffic for our customer.
Until now we use webalizer and read the monthly sums in his report, but that
is'nt a nice job, so i tried this skrip
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
> packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number
hi,
for our accounting i tried to write a script that uses net-acct (an
user-space daemon to log all network traffic over an net-device) to collect
the webtraffic for our customer.
Until now we use webalizer and read the monthly sums in his report, but that
is'nt a nice job, so i tried this skri
16 matches
Mail list logo
