At 11:08 AM 3/2/00 +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
>To give you an idea of the scope of the problem we have received
>about eleven thousand bounces with the same forged address over
>the last month. All of the Spam was launced from AOL, and relayed
>using a whole list of open relays - many in Eastern E
> We send copies of this spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a daily basis.
> The only response I have ever had from AOL is from an
> autoresponder.
hmm...
>From my experience AOL has always been quite cooperative in such cases,
though we always called them directly when there was a major spam
problem..
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:08:20 +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
>Hello All
>
>A professional spammer is using a forged "From:" header line
>which quotes a non existant address at one of our domains. Every
>spam he sends to a bad address gets bounced to us. We are
>running qmail, which by default, accepts
[I am somewhat concerned about the size of the cc list - in that it
covers several lists - but for now have let it stand since this is more
than just an exim issue]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> We send copies of this spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a daily basis. The
> only response I have ever had
Hello All
A professional spammer is using a forged "From:" header line
which quotes a non existant address at one of our domains. Every
spam he sends to a bad address gets bounced to us. We are
running qmail, which by default, accepts these bounces then
handles them as "double bounces".
To
5 matches
Mail list logo
