Re: Re[6]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-23 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 23 June 2001 03:35, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote: > >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get > >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /. > > I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a > sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a

Re: Re[6]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-23 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 23 June 2001 03:35, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote: > >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get > >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /. > > I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a > sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a

Re[6]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
Hey Russell, Friday, June 22, 2001, 7:22:41 PM, you wrote: >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /. I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a line co

Re[6]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
Hey Russell, Friday, June 22, 2001, 7:22:41 PM, you wrote: >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /. I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a line c