Re: Re[4]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 22 June 2001 17:33, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote: > RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed > up then RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much... > > I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get > messed up, it wouldn't affect /.

Re: Re[4]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 22 June 2001 17:33, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote: > RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed > up then RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much... > > I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get > messed up, it wouldn't affect /.

Re[4]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
Hey Russell, Friday, June 22, 2001, 11:07:37 AM, you wrote: RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed up then RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much... I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get messed up, it wouldn't affect /. RC>

Re[4]: disk partition schemes

2001-06-22 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
Hey Russell, Friday, June 22, 2001, 11:07:37 AM, you wrote: RC> What exactly will that save you from? If the root FS gets messed up then RC> having a separate /boot won't gain you much... I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get messed up, it wouldn't affect /. RC>