Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-20 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 20 February 2004 20.10, Arnd Vehling wrote: > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote: > >>Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly > >>installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run?

Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-20 Thread Arnd Vehling
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote: Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run? Is it an option to run that app in a chroot? Sure. I though about

Re: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-19 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Friday 20 February 2004 07.36, Arnd Vehling wrote: [app requires new libc] > Can anyone clue me in on how to get those two forsaken libs cleanly > installed on a debian stable system so this damn binary will run? Is it an option to run that app in a chroot? cheers -- vbi -- Today is Sweetm

RE: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found

2004-02-19 Thread Daniel Hooper
Arnd, I don't know if it would work or not, but id be looking at running it in a chroot jail or possibly even UML. This way it would only require the libs it needs and the rest of the system should be fairly stable and it will make it easy to upgrade the package at a later date or the libs/prerequ