Greetings!
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:20:05 +0200 Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Don't use it. I've been through many open source and self-made IP
> accounting tools, and using tcpdump is not what one would like. It
> gets really messy on high throughput.
"Messy" as in higher load than IPt
On 21 Jul 2003 at 8:50, Volker Tanger wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2003 23:35:08 +0300 kgb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't
> > like it anymore because it make my system under high load.
>
> If you don't want to mess around with IPtables j
Volker Tanger wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> On 19 Jul 2003 23:35:08 +0300 kgb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't
> > like it anymore because it make my system under high load.
>
> If you don't want to mess around with IPtables just to
Greetings!
On 19 Jul 2003 23:35:08 +0300 kgb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't
> like it anymore because it make my system under high load.
If you don't want to mess around with IPtables just to do traffic
accounting, you could try
Am 12:27 2003-07-20 -0400 hat George Georgalis geschrieben:
>I don't run it, I'm just a by stander; but I bet you are not dealing
>with cpu issues but disk io. run top and compare system load to your cpu
>state % idle time.
>
>If you've got idle cpu, and load over one, you are most likely dealing
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:02:12PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:02:07PM +0300, kgb wrote:
>>
>>Yes, you're right but my question is, is there have other way to do accounting
>>some bash, shell script to fetch traffic with "tc" command from cbq shaper ?
>
>I don't reall
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 08:02:07PM +0300, kgb wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 19:27, George Georgalis wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 07:01:24PM +0300, kgb wrote:
>> >On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:58, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> >> Hello Russian Secret Service Agent...
>> >>
>> >> Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 19:27, George Georgalis wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 07:01:24PM +0300, kgb wrote:
> >On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:58, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Hello Russian Secret Service Agent...
> >>
> >> Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0300 hat kgb geschrieben:
> >> >
> >> >Hello,
> >> >
> >> >W
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 07:01:24PM +0300, kgb wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:58, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Hello Russian Secret Service Agent...
>>
>> Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0300 hat kgb geschrieben:
>> >
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't like
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:58, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Russian Secret Service Agent...
>
> Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0300 hat kgb geschrieben:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't like
> >it anymore because it make my system under high load.
> >
Hello Russian Secret Service Agent...
Am 23:35 2003-07-19 +0300 hat kgb geschrieben:
>
>Hello,
>
>Which is best way for traffic accounting i use ipac-ng but i don't like
>it anymore because it make my system under high load.
>
>Thanks in advanced.
I think there is no other choice...
I use ipac o
I use fiprad ( Fast IP router accounting daemon) for logging traffic from
multiple gateways to a central mSQL server. It uses stuff all CPU. I am very
impressed with it.
I have added a few small things of my own such as an fiprad.rc start/stop
script and am working on some PHP scripts for inter
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Teun Vink wrote:
> > Well.. I especially need numbers, since we want to bill excessive traffic
> Shouldn't it be sufficient then do sum up the netacct data of both
> interfaces?
>
>
> MfG/Regards,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Teun Vink wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to setup up some sort of traffic accounting in our
> network. I know how to do this using ipchains rules, but the problem is
> that our network is completely redundant, so each machine in the network
> has two gateways (both Debian
Hi
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:34:52PM +0100, Teun Vink wrote:
> Well.. I especially need numbers, since we want to bill excessive traffic
Shouldn't it be sufficient then do sum up the netacct data of both
interfaces?
MfG/Regards, Alexander
--
Alexander Reelsen http://joker.rhwd.de
[EMAIL PR
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Teun Vink wrote:
> > I would like to setup up some sort of traffic accounting in our
> > network. I know how to do this using ipchains rules, but the problem is
> > that our network is completely red
Hi
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Teun Vink wrote:
> I would like to setup up some sort of traffic accounting in our
> network. I know how to do this using ipchains rules, but the problem is
> that our network is completely redundant, so each machine in the network
> has two gateways (
17 matches
Mail list logo