Re: slapadd speed

2003-03-03 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:30, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > databaseldbm > > cachesize 10 > > dbcachesize 1000 > > I suspect the law of diminishing returns here. Cachesize (in entries) is > a factor 100 above slapd's default, the same for dbcachesize. I have no > idea what thei

Re: slapadd speed

2003-03-03 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:30, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > databaseldbm > > cachesize 10 > > dbcachesize 1000 > > I suspect the law of diminishing returns here. Cachesize (in entries) is > a factor 100 above slapd's default, the same for dbcachesize. I have no > idea what thei

Re: slapadd speed

2003-02-28 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 02:34:57PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > I am having problems with the speed of slapadd for creating a new LDAP > directory from an LDIF file. > > I am using a SMP machine with 2* 1.8GHz P4 Xeon CPUs and 4G of RAM. > > I only have minimal indexing defined as listed

Re: slapadd speed

2003-02-28 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 02:34:57PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > I am having problems with the speed of slapadd for creating a new LDAP > directory from an LDIF file. > > I am using a SMP machine with 2* 1.8GHz P4 Xeon CPUs and 4G of RAM. > > I only have minimal indexing defined as listed