Re: privileges problem

2001-06-25 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 24 June 2001 16:15, Jeff S Wheeler wrote: > Also, stock 2.4.x series kernel limits supplementary groups to 32. Good point! > There would be a per-process penalty for increasing that limit. You > could patch apache to include the supplemental groups when it forks > children (if it does

Re: privileges problem

2001-06-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 24 June 2001 16:15, Jeff S Wheeler wrote: > Also, stock 2.4.x series kernel limits supplementary groups to 32. Good point! > There would be a per-process penalty for increasing that limit. You > could patch apache to include the supplemental groups when it forks > children (if it doe

Re: privileges problem

2001-06-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 23 June 2001 14:40, :yegon wrote: > while configuring dynamic virtual hosting (with mod_vhost_alias) on a > new server i ran into this problem > > i create a new group named g(username) for each new virtual web, I set > all user files to chmod 640 to avoid them to be read by another use

Re: privileges problem

2001-06-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 23 June 2001 14:40, :yegon wrote: > while configuring dynamic virtual hosting (with mod_vhost_alias) on a > new server i ran into this problem > > i create a new group named g(username) for each new virtual web, I set > all user files to chmod 640 to avoid them to be read by another us